To advance to a particular topic from this meeting review, please click on one of the links below:

Point-of-Care (POC) Data Management

What constitutes
CIC compliance? 

What is
“Wireless” in POCT? 

Data Management Systems

"One Year After Sunset"
A Look at Point of Care Data and Instrument Management After the CIC

A Review of the July 9, 2002 Meeting

Purpose

  • Demystify work performed by CIC (Connectivity Industry Consortium)

  • Learn about open data management for POCT

  • Assist in decision making for purchase of data management systems

  • Advantages of RALS-Plus

Point-of-Care (POC) Data Management

History

  • POC data management started as a process where all tests were documented on paper and an audit trail was followed through manual filing.

  • The “Sneaker Net” was then designed where technical personnel were sent to patient care areas (in their sneakers) to download information with a laptop or personal computer.  Data was sorted in the computer.

  • Basic connectivity allowed the retirement of sneakers by the advance of downloading and uploading data through a modem or network.  Data was sent from each patient care area to a main computer, generally in the POCT Coordinator’s office.

  • The next advancement brought a connection of the main computer (in the coordinator’s office) with the Laboratory Information System (LIS). 

  • Subsequently, the need is for a multi-analyte and enterprise-wide solution with full, bi-directional device integration and full ADT and LIS integration for all POC tests.

Connectivity Industry Consortium (CIC)

  • The CIC was formed (February 2000) in response to the need to develop a standard for POCT connectivity so each vendor did not need to reinvent the wheel for POCT instrument communication to LIS and HIS.

  • This group was composed of personnel from vendors, suppliers, and hospitals located in the United States.  Participation was voluntary.

  • The participants designed a set of standards that should provide a universal solution to the multi-vendor problem of POCT connectivity. 

  • Compliance with the CIC standards in voluntary.

Back to top

What constitutes CIC compliance? 

CIC compliance requires only Health Level 7 (HL7) LIS interface (from data manager computer to LIS).

CIC Defined Four Components and Three Data Protocols of POCT (the following are CIC recommendations)

The four components are:  (1) Testing Devices, (2) Access Points, (3) Data Management Systems, and (4) Clinical Information Systems.   The three data protocols link the four components:  (1) device and access point specifications, (2) device messaging and layer specifications, and (3) observation reporting interface specifications.

  1. Testing Devices:  any device, instrument, analyzer (handheld or benchtop) used for POCT.

  2. Device and Access Point Specifications:  (POCT1-A – DAP Spec)

    1. This refers to the basic ability of the device to communicate.

    2. It is the language for devices and Local Area Network (LAN) accessing

    3. CIC specified that each device should follow the protocol of the IrDA (Infrared Data Association).  Each device should be able to communicate through cables or InfraRed wireless.

    4. Each device should be able to identify itself by using IEEE Std 1073 (for medical devices) to a specific data manager.

    5. Self-identification should allow multiple devices to share one network.

  3.   Access Points:  refers to the data and the network sending  the data

  4.   Device Messaging Layering Specifications:  (POCT1-A – DML Spec)

    1. These call for two channels, where one is automatically configured in each device by every vendor, and one is vendor defined:

      1. The first channel includes: POCT1-A device identification, serial number, date, time, operator ID, QC lot number, strip or cassette lot number, patient ID, test results, and comments codes/corrective action.

      2. The second channel is determined by the vendor and allows the vendor to remain competitive.  These options include: device configuration (global or unique – clock, volume, alerts, etc.), lockout management (patient, operator, QC), reagent and QC formatting, remote operation or management, auto-calibration, firmware updates and/or upgrades.

    2. If every vendor adopts POCT1-A, then…

  • Devices will be “plug and play”

  • Only CIC standard data is assured

  • Technology differentiation will persist

  • Competitive differentiation will persist

  • Alliances/partnerships will flourish

  • “Work-arounds” will not be required

Back to top

What is “Wireless” in POCT?

  • CIC did not specify any new technology and, therefore, did not recommend that devices should be wireless.

  • Wireless ethernet which transmits data at 10x106 bits per second (bps) is currently existing and in use as nonlicensed ISM bands.  These Industrial (26.0 MHz), Scientific (83.5 MHz) and Medical (125.0MHz) bands do not have to be registered with the FCC and are reserved for public use.  In general, the higher the frequency, the greater the bandwidth, the faster data can be transmitted.  The disadvantage to this technology is that interference with multiple users can occur.

  • Spread SpectrumTechnology:

    Narrow Band

    • Used by radio, TV, 2-way radios.

    • Licensed by FCC to ensure that no other users in the local area broadcast through the same frequency.

    • Expensive for licensing

    • Approximately 17 mile radius

Unlicensed Spread Spectrum

  • No license needed

  • ISM bands

InfraRed

  • No license needed

  • But does need an unobscured line of sight communication

  • These are currently available: SureStep, iStat, PDAs

  • “Point and Squirt”

“Real time” testing devices to come!  These will still require management and review.  These devices will be tightly regulated.

Back to top

Data Management Systems

Refers to the computer that the device downloads to.  Medical Automation Systems (MAS) is the company that developed RALS.

MAS history:

  • 1994:  Founded company based on RALS technology developed at UVA.

  • 1995:  launched RALS for blood gases.  Vendor independent.

  • 1996:  developed RALS-G for glucose testing.  Device specific product.

  • 1998:  co-marketing agreement w/ Roche Diagnostics.

  • 1999:  launched RALS-Link, RALS-LIS, RALS-ADT and LabScheduler.  Charter and founding member of CIC

  • 2000:  Launched TIARA

  • 2001:  Re-gained vendor independent position.  Launched RALS-Plus.

RALS-G: (1996)

  • Roche wanted to connect their glucose meters to eliminate “sneaker net”

  • Design based on GTS/HDM data protocols

  • LIS interface was an added benefit to Roche

  • Classic vendor/device specific data mgmnt.

  • State-of-the-art for it’s time

MAS vision:

  • Optimize the potential for customers to achieve regulatory compliance and generate revenue while improving efficiency and containing cost.

  • To be universally recognized as the optimum information management solution for hospital POCT.

RALS Plus (2001)

  • Device independent, multi-vendor, generic

  • More than CIC compliant

  • Allows for:

    • Proactive mgmnt of ALL POCT

    • One electronic QC review for ALL POCT

    • One certification process for ALL POCT

    • One PC, one LIS interface for ALL POCT

    • One data repository for regulatory review for ALL POCT

The rest of the discussion focused on a brief overview of the user screens available on RALS-Plus

Back to top

Previous SoCal
Meeting Recaps

October 16, 2001

June 19, 2001

February 27, 2001

September 16, 2000

June 20, 2000

POCC Directory

Test Grid

Back to SoCalPOCC Home

Last updated: 09/13/2002
Questions or corrections: Webmaster