|
Tuesday, June 20, 2000
"POC Assessment, Regulations, & Billing"
Meeting
Minutes UCLA Medical Center, Hosted by Vida Montgomery
- I. Introductions (by Vida Montgomery): Valerie Johnson
(Roche), Alan Watson (MAS), Marcy Anderson, Senior Clinical Specialist
(MAS)
- II. Point
of Care Testing and Data Management Issues (Marcy Anderson)
- A. Reasons
for POCT Growth.
- 1. Faster
TAT
- a. physician
belief that bedside testing will decrease TAT.
b. TATs may decrease but really depends on location of central
lab and logistics of sample procurement.
- 2. Vendors
are making more POCT devices
- a. in response
to customer feedback
b. in response to a larger list of waived tests and home use
testing kits.
- 3. Regulatory
bodies are changing
- a. more agencies
are involved in regulation of POCT devices
- B. Issues
of Concern in POCT
- 1. Data Management
- a. any new
analyzers or systems should have data management capabilities.
- b. CIC - Connectivity
Industry Consortium
- 1) can be
found on the web at "poc.cic.org".
- 2) a group
of vendors that are coming together to set standards for consolidation
of data management into ONE PC.
- 3) standards
will then be presented to NCCLS for approval in the hope that
any new analyzers can meet these guidelines for use on one data
management system.
- 2. Standardization
- a. of all
hospital sites in a health care system managed by one coordinator
will have only ONE type of glucose meter, ONE type of ACT analyzer,
etc.
- 3. Bar-coding
- a. if analyzers
all had bar-code scanning capabilities, positive ID can be used
for reagents, operators and pateints.
- b. Of course,
this would only be possible if all staff memebers had bar-coded
Ids, and our patients al had bar-coded ID bands.
- 4. Financial
assessment of a POCT program
- a. most POCT
managers are not aware of the financial side of a POCT program.
- 5. More POCT
FTE's
- a. too much
work and not enough time!
- 6. POC Committee
- a. sends awareness
of POC testing to all facets of the hospital.
- C. RALS Products
- 1. RALS-Link
2. RALS-G (for glucose)
3. RALS-Plus (other tests)
4. Lab scheduler (easier lab scheduling of personnel)
5. Clinical patient management ( patient trending)
6. POC Assessment (Consultation process available to evaluate
the POCT program)
- a. Executive
Presentation
- 1) introduction
to what the POC Assessment includes.
2) Done to get hospital wide interest and understanding of POCT.
3) Staff members to attend this session include: materials management
managers, risk management managers, nursing managers, billing
administrators, lab managers
- b. Identify
Issues
- 1) consultants
will talk to RNs, MDs on patient care areas to collect information
on :
- a) how current
procedures are performed
b) what things can be improved
c) what else is needed at POC
- c. Executive
Summary Presentation
- 1) Written
report presented to those who were in initial Executive Presentation
2) Includes:
- a) comparison
of current findings to regulatory issues. Determining which issues
are in compliance, which are not and how they can be made compliant.
b) Efficiencies of current procedures and suggestions to improve
these if necessary.
c) Cost saving suggestions
d) Potential revenue
- i) if not
billing, best to start right away because any little bit helps
- e) current
status of resource utilization and suggestions for improvement.
- d. Benefits
of POC Assessment
- 1) Educates
all facets of the hospital in POCT
2) Identifies eficiencies and cost savings
3) Builds awareness of POCT hospital wide
4) Regulatory viability review
5) Waste assessment
6) Quantify costs of POCT program
- III. Discussion
/ Questions
- A. Is an overview
of HIS / LIS included in the POC assessment?
- 1. Marcy Anderson:
No. More information is needed and staff at a higher level (CFO,
CEO) need to be involved with suggestions involving a change
in the HIS or LIS.
- B. How many
days does the POC assessment take?
- 1. M.A.: One
to two days at the site. Then 6 weeks to prepare the final report
- C. Is billing
actually that useful when Medicare pays based on DRGs?
- 1. M.A.: Success
of billing practices would be based on the patient mix
self-pay
or Medicare.
- D. Any comments
on documentation of manual POC tests?
- 1. M.A.: Something
that we're looking into with the RALS-plus
- E. You mentioned
about staff members not filling out sheets, how about addressing
problems with staff filing out the sheets, but not sure if they
actually do the QC testing?
- 1. M.A.: No
answer.
- IV. Announcements
(Vida)
- A. September
16th, at the Westin there will be a POCT seminar worth 6 CEU
B. Anna Huff will assist with updating the LA POCT User's website
C. Next meeting will be October 24th at Santa Monica-UCLA Medical
Center. Intended topic will be ACTs.
D. Short discussion regarding future meeting sites. Decided that
for 2001, meeting site will stay at UCLA Medical Center.
E. Committees:
- 1. Speaker
/ Topics: Monica Thomas and Lee Flores
2. Food: Porntip Weises and Anthony Johnson
3. Invitations: Jessica Graves
4. Meeting Minutes: rotating
- V. Meeting
Adjourned at 1340.
End
of Meeting Minutes
Dateline:
SoCalPOC Users Group, Los Angeles, CA
Wednesday, February 9, 2000
A man in a
wheelchair tries to negotiate his way through a gap in a crowded
hallway at the same time that a nurse is trying to wheel a patient
on a gurney through the same crowd of people. Judging from the
look on his face, he wonders, "Who are these people, and
why are they gathering here?
He was witnessing
the initial gathering of a group of laboratorians who share the
special challenge of managing the point-of-care testing that
takes place in their various hospitals. There were 16 Point-Of-Care
Coordinators in attendance, plus Roche Diagnostics Account Managers
Curt Ryan and Valerie Johnson, who sponsored the inaugural meeting
and provided great food, mailers and other support. This diverse
group met with the goal of sharing ideas for refining policies
and improving procedures.
Vida Montgomery,
the POC Coordinator for UCLA Health Sciences Center, hosted the
meeting and is enthusiastically ready to do it again. Her vision
for the future of these meetings, shared by the others in attendance,
involves educational and scientific presentations, product demonstrations
and professional peer-group exchanges. As an added benefit, you'll
enjoy some social interaction with a few other lab professionals
who can relate to the task you face.
If you're reading
this, consider it your electronic invitation to participate.
In fact, this Website is intended as an encouragement to you,
the coordinators of ancillary testing and laboratorians in general
to communicate together. This is your resource to use as needed
for the benefit of your profession, on a local, regional or national
scope.
The next SoCal
POC User's Group meeting features Marcy Anderson, formerly the
POCC of Pinnacle Health System, a four hospital IHN in Harrisburg,
Pennsylvania. Currently, Marcy manages the Point-of-Care Assessment
Program, a consulting service which provides detailed information
resources to a hospital's management team regarding their own
POC testing activities. The topic for the June meeting will be
"POC Assessment, Regulations, & Billing/Cost Saving
Issues".
SoCalPOC
User's Group
Moderator Guidelines for Discussions
1.Moderator
duty will rotate among the members.
2.A member will volunteer at the close of each meeting.
3.The Moderator will choose the topic from a list prepared by
the members including those turned in at the meetings and any
sent via email.
4.The topic will be published at least 1 month before the meeting.
5.During the discussion, the Moderator will call on members who
have indicated that they have something to say by raising their
hands.
6.The moderator will watch the time, allowing no more than 3
minutes per turn for each member to speak.
7.We will stay with one topic until the Moderator suggests a
change.
8.When the Moderator suggests a change, written topics/questions
turned in during the meeting will be addressed first.
9.Time permitting, verbal topics/questions from the members may
be addressed.
10.The last duty of the Moderator is to choose a volunteer to
be the Moderator of the next meeting. |