Contact Us I  Home I 

POC Calendar > POC Groups > POCC of the Year > POC Vendors > POC Tests > POC Procedures >

Key Steps for POCT in Physician Offices
Edwina Szelag, MHM, BSMT (ASCP)

You’ve been asked to take a look at a physician’s office practice after a recent merger. Do physician office laboratories (POL) need to follow the same CLIA standards as traditional clinical laboratories and point-of-care testing programs?

Answer: All clinical laboratory testing is subject to CLIA regulations, and the type of CLIA certificate for the POL should be considered along with the test menu to be offered, devices that will be used, and staff performing testing. There are several CLIA certificates. For example, if the POL will be performing only waived testing, then a CLIA Certificate of Waiver is appropriate. If the POL will be performing wet mounts, fern tests, and other microscopy, the Certificate of Provider Performed Microscopy Procedures is needed.

 

For more Q & A's on this subject, click here.

 

In Lab QC, How Much Room for Improvement?
 Anne Paxton, CAP Today

 The debut of the CMS’ new quality control option, IQCP, has sharpened the focus on QC in the laboratory and raised hopes that risk management concepts can make QC more robust. But one of the most highly regarded quality control experts in the U.S. voices skepticism about the impact of IQCP—and indeed, about U.S. quality control standards in general. As a voluntary, customizable QC option under CLIA, IQCP or Individualized Quality Control Plan is expected to give labs greater flexibility in achieving QC compliance. However, the CLIA QC standards, unchanged since 2003, will remain the same—and that’s a problem, says James Westgard, PhD, who spoke about QC weaknesses at the 2013 Lab Quality Confab presented by The Dark Report.

To read an interview with James Westgard, PhD, click here...

 

The FDA Is Not Giving Up on Regulating Laboratory-Developed Tests 
 Agency Plans a Decade-Long Road to Implementation
 By Bill Malone, Clinical Laboratory News, November 2014, An AACC Publication
  
 After the Food and Drug Administration (FDA) announced in 2010 its intention to regulate laboratory-developed tests (LDTs), lab advocacy groups, biotech companies, and even Congress pushed back so hard that by 2013, FDA leaders described their efforts as mired in politics and, at best, uncertain. Now, with a surprise announcement in July that FDA will proceed with plans to regulate LDTs followed by a draft guidance published October 3, a newly confident and determined FDA has hit the ground running.

 

According to FDA, its plan will give labs plenty of time to accommodate stepped-up oversight. During a September 10 AACC webinar, FDA Director of In Vitro Diagnostics Alberto Gutierrez, PhD, laid out a 9-year timeframe to implement LDT regulation. But the clock doesn’t even start on that timeline until after FDA issues a final guidance, a process that could take years. Based on FDA’s history with LDTs, the one thing certain is that the initial plan will not look exactly like the final plan—and it will probably take even longer to implement than the agency would like. Click here for more...

 

Treating Patients with Ebola Virus Infection in the U.S.: Lessons Learned
 IDWeek, October 2014, Bruce Ribner, MD, MPH, Emory Univ. Hosp., Atlanta, GA

At the recently held IDWeek, Dr. Bruce Ribner spoke on caring for Ebola patients in the US. Dr. Ribner led the team at Emory University that cared for two patients with Ebola virus disease (EVD) in August. In light of the recent Ebola cases in Dallas and Spain he agreed that a summary could be provided to assist ID specialists in their ongoing preparedness efforts.

 

Planning for the care of patients This involves the entire institution, and needs many sections to coordinate their work. EMS services were an important coordination point for the transport of the 2 patients to Emory. On the medical staff, many types of expertise were needed for clinical management: ID, critical care, anesthesiology and several other subspecialties. Nursing, environmental management, facilities, security and media relations were all intensively involved ahead of time so that expected roles were defined. Even so, there were times when questions arose after the patients arrived.

For a summary of this talk, click here. For basic information about Ebola, click here or on the image to the right. For more details on Ebola click here to visit the CDC website or many of the other healthcare sites with articles on the Ebola situation.

 

 

Optimizing Point-of-Care PT/INR Testing
 Marcia L. Zucker, PhD, Clinical Laboratory News, September, 2014

Coagulation testing, especially the global coagulation test prothrombin time (PT), is not exactly an ideal laboratory test. I say this because PT does not evaluate a well-defined analyte with results reflected as a concentration of that analyte. Rather, PT assesses the interaction of more than a dozen different enzymes within a blood sample, and a PT test result reflects a clotting time measured at a different end point for each instrument used.

In addition, the reagent for the PT test, thromboplastin, is not standardized. The original thromboplastin reagents were crude preparations from multiple tissue types from several different species. Today, thromboplastins may consist of recombinant rabbit or human brain protein complexed with phospholipids. There is limited standardization, achieved through use of the international normalized ratio (INR), for patients on long-term oral anticoagulant therapy with vitamin K antagonists such as warfarin and coumarin. More >

 

Quality Practices & POCT
Defining quality in POCT is offering more than just quick results
By Charles K. Cooper, MD, September 4, 2014, Advance for Administrators of the Lab, Issue 9

Point-Of-Care Testing
The world of laboratory medicine has changed considerably in the last decade. Specifically, the need for hospitals to improve capacity utilization and efficiency as more patients seek care has propelled clinical laboratories into a bold new journey in point-of-care testing (POCT). As new efforts bring advanced testing to point-of-care (POC) locations, there must also be new criteria for evaluating POC tests. To effectively meet the goal of POCT-which is to offer high-quality testing at primary care locations to streamline patient management-POC diagnostics need to meet quality standards across a broader range of categories. Beyond providing accurate and fast results, the quality of these tests must be equally determined by evaluating their scalability, ease-of-use, cost ­structure, and effectiveness in improving healthcare system efficiency. POCT Success Factors more >

 

Risk Management Steps Up Labs’ QC Game Under IQCP
By Anne Paxton, CAP Today, September 2014

Industrial risk management. It may not seem all that sexy as a concept, but in the field of laboratory quality control, risk management has become about as buzzworthy as is possible. One of the key reasons: The Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services has embraced risk management as the foundation of a new option for meeting CLIA quality control standards called IQCP, or Individualized Quality Control Plan.

A voluntary QC option under CLIA, IQCP aims to give labs greater flexibility in achieving QC compliance by customizing lab QC plans to each unique testing environment via the use of risk-management strategies. Employing electronic/integrated controls, IQCP intends to adapt to future technological advances and strengthen manufacturer-laboratory partnerships.

“Many assays appear to be okay when we run our QC,” says Alison Woodworth, PhD, director of esoteric chemistry, associate director of clinical chemistry, and assistant professor in the Department of Pathology, Microbiology, and Immunology at Vanderbilt University Medical Center. “But when we do more in-depth risk analyses, they may not be okay.” With IQCP, “labs will have a choice now. They can use a one-size-fits-all approach of running two levels of external QC material once a day, the bare minimum under CLIA requirements, or they can do a risk-assessment evaluation to better determine how their assays are performing and how much QC they should run.”

Read more >

 

Managing Risk: Preventing Errors at the POC
 July 2014, by Sarah Njoroge, PhD and James H. Nichols, PhD, DABCC, FACB, Clinical Laboratory News

Although point-of-care testing (POCT) provides rapid test results and the opportunity for faster medical decisions, the unique risk of errors with POCT raises concern over the quality and reliability of test results. In contrast to the central laboratory, where errors predominately occur in the pre- and post-analytic phases, POCT errors occur primarily in the analytic phase of testing. This might be related to the non-laboratory staff involved in POCT, but might also be due to test limitations and misuse of POCT in extreme environmental conditions. Clinical personnel with minimal laboratory skills and experience, such as nurses and patient care technicians, perform the majority of POCT. These operators are focused on patient care and do not necessarily understand why they must handle POCT—a task viewed as a laboratory role and not a job for clinical staff.Yet regulatory standards hold the laboratory director responsible for managing and supervising POCT quality. In a clinic setting, the laboratory director may be a physician, but in a hospital or health system, the chief of pathology and head of the central laboratory often become responsible. POCT is thus at odds with both the clinical staff performing the test as well as the laboratory staff responsible for supervising the test. This conflict creates a situation ripe for errors. More >

 

A POC Glucose Program Turned Upside Down:
How a 17-hospital system survived a rollout and new requirements
 Anne Ford, CAP Today, July 2014

When Rosemary Frederick learned last year that her employer, North Shore-LIJ Health System of New York state, would be switching from the Roche Accu-Chek Inform I point-of-care glucose meter to the Inform II due to a maltose interference issue, she knew she and her colleagues were facing a heck of a lot of work. “I want you to realize the enormousness of this project,” says Frederick, who is the point-of-care manager for the health system’s core laboratories. “It wasn’t one hospital and 1,500 people. We had to roll out over 1,000 meters, and we had to train over 13,000 people system-wide.”

Click here

 

FDA Moves on Blood Glucose Meters
 Manufacturers, Labs Wary of Big Changes
By Bill Malone, May 2014 Clinical Laboratory News: Volume 40, Number 5

Few laboratory instruments are as ubiquitous as the humble blood glucose meter. Yet in recent years, they have become essential not only for managing patients with diabetes, but also for improving outcomes for other groups of patients at the point-of-care. Studies connecting hyperglycemia with poor outcomes have led many hospitals to rely on the convenience of these meters for managing care across a spectrum of hospitalized patients.

Regulators, however, including the Food and Drug Administration (FDA) and the Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services (CMS), have become increasingly concerned about this practice because none of the meters on the market are FDA-cleared for use in critically ill patients, such as in the emergency department or intensive care unit. In fact, manufacturers submit meters intended for hospital use as over-the-counter devices, which means that FDA clears them based on the same standard as the home-use meters found in drug stores. More >

 

AACC Supports FDA Effort

to Improve Blood Glucose Meters

But Believes the New Standards Could Encumber the Use of These Monitors Without Benefiting Patients

In January, the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA) released draft guidance proposing separate performance and accuracy criteria for over-the-counter blood glucose meters used in the home and prescription blood glucose meters used in hospitals. AACC supports FDA's initiative to improve the quality of these devices and enhance patient care, but recommends revising this draft guidance to ensure that it does not unnecessarily increase the regulatory burden and costs on the healthcare system.

Blood glucose meters are best known in their over-the-counter form for helping many of the 19 million Americans with diabetes to manage their condition. These devices have also become essential for managing care for other groups of patients in hospitals in recent years, as studies have uncovered a connection between high blood sugar and poor outcomes. FDA has become increasingly concerned about this practice, however, because blood glucose meters aren't cleared for use in critically ill patients, who may present with physiological variables that could interfere with the accuracy of these devices. More >

 

 

Quality Control in POCT

By Sarah Kee, MAY 2014 ADVANCE/ LABORATORY


The variety of point-of-care tests (POCT) has evolved significantly in recent years. Whilst these instruments bring undisputed benefits in obtaining rapid results at the patient’s bedside, these benefits are only true if the results are accurate and reliable. Quality controls (QC) exists to ensure accuracy and reliability. For many of the healthcare workers using POCT instruments, QC will be unfamiliar territory. More >

How POC Testing is Pushing the Envelope

From New Tests to Glucose Meters and the FDA

CAP Today, April 2014, By Anne Paxton

 

It can be hard to remember a time when GPS was not available in cars, the Web didn’t exist, and only eight diagnostic tests were classified as waived and able to be performed at the point of care. But after CLIA’s enactment in 1988, those were some basic realities of location and speed.

 

Today, whether for blood gas and electrolytes, glucose, coagulation, cardiac markers, drugs of abuse, food pathogens, hemoglobin, or infectious diseases, hundreds of tests once considered too complex for point of care are routinely performed outside the laboratory. But some of the nation’s experts in point-of-care testing say that developments on the near horizon could make previous advances in POC testing look tame. More

Glucose vs. Hemoglobin A1c
Usefulness, limitations and complementary markers are explored
By David Plaut and Audrey Farrell; APRIL 2014 • ADVANCE/LABORATORY • WWW.ADVANCEWEB.COM
There is no argument that measurements of hemoglobin A1c (A1c) and glucose (G) each play important roles in the diagnosis and treatment of diabetics. As useful as these two markers are, we must accept the fact that neither is a perfect marker. Understanding the limitations of these markers will aid clinicians in better use of them and assist them when choosing complementary markers when A1c and/or G are not satisfactory or sufficient. A1c Value
 More > PDF  I  Online

Point-of-Care Testing - Pros, cons and how the lab can benefit
By Jonathon Northover, JD; APRIL 2014 • ADVANCE/LABORATORY • WWW.ADVANCEWEB.COM

The point-of-care testing (POCT) market (perhaps more accurately referred to as the point of testing), is an established growth area. Predictions regarding the growth rate vary but the general consensus is that in the United States, we have already entered a significant growth phase. While it is a relatively new market, we are arguably two-thirds of the way through the typical 30 year period that it takes for a new healthcare technology to become fully established.

A Growing Market Between 2003 and 2009 it is said to have doubled in size. In 2012, one study suggested that it will be worth $16.5 billion worldwide in 2013, about $3.93 billion of which will be in the United States. Of these values, glucose testing is by far the largest component. There are multiple underlying drivers of this growth. For example, the technology (the devices as well as the reagents) is becoming less expensive to create and deploy, and therefore more widely used. Another driver is the need for increased efficiency. POCT usually decreases turnaround times, with immediate results. Faster results mean faster treatment. No additives are needed, and a sample will often only require a finger stick. In the current healthcare environment where cost pressures to do more with less continue, this is no small advantage. Pros of POCT... More > PDF  I  Online

Diabetes Debate: HbA1c or Glucose?
By Anne Paxton, CAP Today, February 2013

If it were a boxing match, the debate over whether hemoglobin A1 c should be used to diagnose diabetes would place the odds-on favorite in the “Yes” corner. In the “No” corner would be the underdog. At least based on the mainstream consensus since 2010, HbA1c for diagnosis is well established as an alternative to measuring glucose. At the July 2013 meeting of the American Association for Clinical Chemistry, where opposing sides on this question squared off in a debate, a quick vote beforehand showed “Yes” with a 20-to-one edge. But the speakers came armed with provocative data on comparative benefits and drawbacks, and both sides scored solid points.  More >

Dropping the ball on critical value POC glucose results?
By Anne Paxton, CAP Today, December 2013

Prompt reporting of critical laboratory results is considered an important patient safety goal. But for one of the most commonly performed tests, point-of-care glucose, there has been limited information about how critical results are handled. A new CAP Q-Probes study finds there is a great deal of variability. In addition to having widely differing critical result cutoff values, many laboratories are not repeating critical POC glucose test results for verification despite the relative high rate of erroneous results on first measurement. More >

POCT Supports New Demands

By Kim Futrell, MT(ASCP), ADVANCE for Administrators of the Laboratory, RESOURCE DIRECTORY 2014 & ANNUAL REPORTS

 

Changes in healthcare open door for point-of-care testing to improve outcomes

One of the fastest areas of growth is point-of-care (POC) testing, estimated to be increasing at 10-12% annually, compared to a 6-7% annual increase in other clinical lab testing. Although home-based point-of-care testing (POCT) is also increasing, 70% of POCT takes place in hospitals, doctors’ offices and other provider locations, and this growth is predicted to continue. More >

The Biggest Mistake Doctors Make

Misdiagnoses are harmful and costly. But they're often preventable.

By Laura Landro, assistant managing editor for The Wall Street Journal

 

Not only are diagnostic problems more common than other medical mistakes—and more likely to harm patients—but they're also the leading cause of malpractice claims, accounting for 35% of nearly $39 billion in payouts in the U.S. from 1986 to 2010, measured in 2011 dollars, according to Johns Hopkins. The good news is that diagnostic errors are more likely to be preventable than other medical mistakes. And now health-care providers are turning to a number of innovative strategies to fix the complex web of errors, biases and oversights that stymie the quest for the right diagnosis. More >

An Uneasy Dance with POC Glucose in the ICU

By Anne Paxton, CAP Today, October 2013

 

“Too much of a good thing can be wonderful,” Mae West famously said. And some feel our culture of excess reflects that value. Perhaps as a reaction there has been a surge of interest recently in the embrace of “enough” as a worthwhile goal. But when it comes to precise measurement of glucose values in the intensive care unit, the often-warring needs for speed and accuracy make the issue a critical matter of patient care. For point-of-care glucose testing in the ICU, how much precision is “enough”? more...

POCT & Patient Safety - Solutions to point-of-care safety concerns are explored
By Anna K. Füzéry, PhD, and William A. Clarke, PhD, MBA, DABCC Advance for Administrators of the Lab, Vol. 22 • Issue 7 • Page 36

POCT  - Quality laboratory testing is an essential part of modern medicine. Historically, such testing has been performed in a central location by highly trained medical technologists. Rapid advances in analytical and computer technology, however, have shifted a significant amount of it to the patient bedside or other non-laboratory sites. While point-of-care testing (POCT) offers some key advantages in patient management, it is also giving rise to notable safety concerns related to infection transmission, patient identification and specimen integrity.

Hospital-Acquired Infections - Healthcare-associated infections (HAIs) are a major safety concern due to their adverse effects on patients, their families and the health system. Estimates suggest that approximately 1.7 million HAIs occur annually in the United States alone.1 Multiple studies indicate that hospital surfaces, including POCT devices, may act as vehicles for the transmission of pathological agents such as methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus and HIV.2,3 In August 2010 the FDA and CDC issued a joint recommendation that point-of-care blood testing devices should not be shared and that, if this is not possible, they should be cleaned and disinfected after every use. More >

Lessons From America's Safest Hospitals
More than 180,000 people die every year from hospital errors. Here's what the top medical centers are doing to improve your odds

by Beth Howard, AARP The Magazine, April/May issue

About 400,000 drug-related injuries occur each year in hospitals, according to an Institute of Medicine study. To help solve the problem, many of the safest hospitals have embraced the use of a computerized provider order entry (CPOE) system, which forces doctors to enter prescriptions into the computer electronically. "It basically eliminates transcription errors," says Anthony J. Ardire, M.D., senior vice president for quality and patient safety at Lehigh Valley Health Network in Allentown, Pennsylvania. More >>

Order More Tests? With Diabetes, May Be ‘YES’
CAP Today, March 2013, Feature Story, By Jan Bowers

In patients with diabetes mellitus, hemoglobin A1c testing frequency is largely in line with recommended guidelines. In those same patients, LDL testing is not performed frequently enough, and urine protein testing frequency falls far short of recommendations. Those are the results of a recently completed Q-Probes study of whether and how laboratories monitor the frequency of diabetes testing, and how closely the frequencies in their institutions hew to the American Diabetes Association recommended guide-lines. “It’s important to focus on both over- and underutilization, because sometimes in the lab we tend to focus only on whether we’re performing tests that may not be necessary,” says Peter L. Perrotta, MD, medical director of clinical laboratories at West Virginia University Hospital, professor of pathology at West Virginia University School of Medicine, and a coauthor of the CAP study. But there’s another side, he says: “Tests that should be ordered are not, or they’re not ordered frequently enough.” More >

Bedside Glucose Testing Systems
Cap Today, March 2013, Brendan Dabkowski

New to the CAP TODAY lineup of point-of-care blood glucose systems is the Roche Accu-Chek Inform II, which the FDA cleared last fall. It offers meter level wireless technology, conducts extensive integrity checks with each test, has an advanced laser bar-code scanner, and provides up to three unique patient identifiers. On the market since 2004, HemoCue’s Glucose 201 DM analyzer has “withstood the test of time,” says product marketing manager Terry Carmichael, who adds that the recent focus has been to develop more flexible connectivity solutions. HemoCue plans to make available options that allow clients to select how they connect HemoCue devices to their [information] system.  Abbott Diabetes Care is working with hospitals to help them achieve their patient safety goals. The Precision Xceed Pro blood glucose and beta-ketone monitoring system is built on Abbott’s “three pillars of patient safety”—bedside accuracy, cross contamination prevention, and hospital compliance. Nova Biomedical’s StatStrip measures and corrects for common interferences such as hematocrit, acetaminophen, and ascorbic acid. StatStrip biosensors eliminate the need for calibration coding, and the system’s large color display presents multiple patient identifiers. Ten bedside glucose testing systems from six companies are profiled. All information is supplied by the companies. More >

Standards of Medical Care in Diabetes - 2013
The American Diabetes Association has released their Standards of Medical Care in Diabetes 2013.Diabetes mellitus is a chronic illness that requires continuing medical care and ongoing patient self-management education and support to prevent acute complications and to reduce the risk of long-term complications. Diabetes care is complex and requires multifactorial risk reduction strategies beyond glycemic control. A large body of evidence exists that supports a range of interventions to improve diabetes outcomes. For more on the Position Statement, click here. For more on the Executive Summary, click here.

Preventing Infections Related to Using Point-of-Care Testing Devices

An Interview with Sharon M. Geaghan, MD
January 2013 Clinical Laboratory News: Volume 39, Number 1

The convenience and immediacy of point-of-care testing (POCT) has led to its use in many settings. But untrained or busy healthcare workers may overlook some basic sanitary practices when using POCT devices. This lack of attention is leading to nosocomial infections that can be attributed to contaminated devices. Here, Sharon M. Geaghan, MD, discusses how these infections occur and how to prevent them. Dr. Geaghan is professor of pathology and pediatrics at Stanford University School of Medicine in Palo Alto, Calif.
Click here for more...

Glycemic Control Data Show Improvement in Glucose Levels
Journal of Hospital Medicine, December 2012

New data show that hospitals may be making some progress in the battle to control glucose levels in non-ICU patients. Research published in the Journal of Hospital Medicine compared point-of-care blood glucose test results from 126 hospitals taken in 2007 and 2009. The values of those test results decreased by 5 mg/dL in non-ICU patients from 2007-2009, but remained unchanged for patients in the ICU.  In this first analysis of glucose changes in US hospitals, improvements over 2 years occurred in non-ICU patients. Ongoing analysis will determine whether this trend continues. Read more.

Understanding Low Sugar from NICE-SUGAR
The New England Journal of Medicine, December 2012

In his editorial about the Normoglycemia in Intensive Care Evaluation–Survival Using Glucose Algorithm Regulation (NICE-SUGAR) study, Hirsch (Sept. 20 issue) declares, “For surgical patients, especially those who have undergone cardiac procedures, hospitals that can safely achieve lower targets should do so.” No justification for this statement is provided. Concerns exist regarding the generalizability of studies of glycemic control in other populations of patients treated in intensive care units (ICUs) that have shown either harm1 or no benefit and regarding both the generalizability and applicability of studies that have shown benefit. Read more.

Glucose in the ICU — Evidence, Guidelines, and Outcomes
The New England Journal of Medicine, December 2012

Agus et al. (Sept. 27 issue)1 report that targeting a blood glucose level of 80 to 110 mg per deciliter (4.4 to 6.1 mmol per liter) in critically ill infants and toddlers (<3 years of age) after cardiac surgery did not alter the clinical outcome. Although the target range for the blood glucose level was “normal” in fasting adults, it indicated
hyperglycemia in infants (normal range, 50 to 80 mg per deciliter [2.8 to 4.4 mmol per liter]). Read more.

Connecting With POCT

By Adetoun Ejilemele, MB.CHB, FWACP, FMCPath (Nig), and Anthony O. Okorodudu, PhD, MBA, DABCC, FACBB

Point-of-care testing plays a significant role in a value-based purchase system Value-based purchasing (VBP) is focused on ensuring synchrony between clinical and financial responsibilities in our healthcare systems. In the VBP, future healthcare payment is linked to quality and efficiency of the care provided. This article was part of the Advance for Administrators of the Laboratory's December 2012 issue which feature a 2013 Resource Directory. For more on this article and to view the digital edition, click here >

Article Archive

 

 

FDA clears ACCU-CHEK Inform II
 Roche’s new hospital point-of-care system for blood glucose testing with improved accuracy and wireless data transfer as well as advances in patient care and durability. Roche announced on Monday, October 15, that it has received clearance from the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA) for the ACCU-CHEK Inform II system, a next-generation blood glucose monitor for hospital point-of-care testing. The ACCU-CHEK Inform II system offers healthcare professionals the first truly wireless hospital blood glucose device. The system utilizes new patented technology to deliver improved accuracy and enables automatic real-time wireless transfer of patient data between hospital medical staff and the laboratory.

“Accuracy and patient safety are the foremost concerns for blood glucose testing in hospitals and other point-of-care settings,” said Roland Diggelmann, chief operating officer at Roche Diagnostics. “ACCU-CHEK systems have been proven in hospitals around the world and this next-generation wireless system sets a new standard by offering U.S. healthcare professionals new capabilities to help ensure the accuracy of test results, streamline data communications and provide optimal patient care.”

The Growth of Point-of-Care Testing in Hospitals
 Cardiac Markers Fuel Growth in $5 Billion Market
Hospital point-of-care (POC) testing continues to grow steadily, with hospitals adding more instruments and rapidly increasing the volume of cardiac testing in particular, according to a new report from strategic consulting firm Enterprise Analysis Corporation (EAC). This brief analyzes data from a 2011 survey of hundreds of hospital-based point-of-care coordinators (POCC), and compares data to the company’s previous survey in 2007.


While POC glucose, blood gas, coagulation, and HbA1c tests have seen a slow, steady rise over the past 4 years, cardiac marker testing has risen sharply, according to EAC senior consultant Michelle Keane. “We were surprised to find 10 percent more hospitals performing cardiac marker testing compared to 2007, and volumes have increased significantly as well,” Keane commented. For stand-alone troponin, nearly twice as many hospitals surveyed by EAC now perform POC testing.

 

Two instruments continue to dominate the cardiac marker POC market, Abbott’s i-STAT system and Alere’s Triage system. The Triage has seen a 70% increase in volume for cardiac tests, and i-STAT’s volumes have tripled.


Keane also noted that POC has become more complex in hospitals, with 23% of institutions reporting use of six or more different POC instruments in 2011 compared to just 5% in 2007. Nearly 50% of hospitals EAC surveyed now have four or more instruments.

Spotlight on Point-of-Care Testing
Innovation, Expansion Evident at AACC Clinical Lab Expo in LA
 By Bill Malone, Clinical Laboratory News

The current issue of CLN features a Spotlight on the 2012 AACC Meeting where more than 120 companies came to Los Angeles to showcase POC products at the AACC Clinical Lab Expo, and the buzz about POC spilled over into sessions at the AACC Annual Meeting. Speakers covered many POC topics, including the explosion of technology and where future opportunities lie. This issue also includes an interview with the 2012 POCC of the Year Pet Maniquis. In addition, hundreds of new products made their debut in Los Angeles and are highlighted in CLN's New Products Review. More >
Note: To access this issue you must be an AACC member - and now is great time to join and take advantage of all the POC related programs AACC and the Critical and Point-of-Care Testing Division have to offer.

Abbott Introduces Advanced Quality Features on its i-STAT Handheld System
Abbott has introduced five new advanced quality features on its leading i-STAT handheld blood analyzer, designed to help hospitals better manage their point-of-care testing programs and ensure compliance with changing laboratory regulations. The i-STAT Advanced Quality Features will help organizations improve compliance, oversight and control of their point-of-care program.

A Review of Tight Glycemic Control more >

Assessing Inpatient Glycemic Control: What Are the Next Steps?

Which Metric Should be Used? more >

Glucose Meter Update
Lifescan customers, follow these tips to smooth your transition to a new meter more >

Update on Inpatient Glycemic Control in Hospitals in the United States
Many quality improvement organizations have been focusing on improving the management of inpatient hyperglycemia. A recent survey of hospitals in the United States demonstrated that the frequencies of hypoglycemia and hyperglycemia were the top 2 metrics of interest to hospitals, and many hospitals have either fully or at least partially implemented inpatient diabetes quality improvement programs. Several quality improvement organizations are promoting the need for better inpatient glycemic control and have developed educational resources to help hospitals achieve better management. Finally, in certain clinical scenarios, better glucose control has been shown to improve patient outcomes. more >

The Evolving World of POCT
 more >

Focus on: COAGULATION Monitoring
 more >

Panel Advises Glucose Testing in All Hospitalized Patients
 More >

Diabetes Cases Double to 347 Million
Rates of diabetes have nearly tripled in the U.S., and more than doubled worldwide since 1980, according to a report this week in the British journal Lancet. More than 347 million patients have diabetes globally, and nearly 25 million in the U.S.. more >

References for "Urine Drug-of-Abuse Testing in the Clinical Lab"
By Jill Hoffman, Advance for the Administrators of the Laboratory
According to a 2009 review in Bioanalysis, use of clinical urine drug tests (UDTs) to monitor patients prescribed controlled substances is a new aspect of clinical medicine that will play an increasing role as physicians treat chronic pain while trying to minimize abuse of opioid analgesics. more >

Glucose Meter Evolution
 By Bob Kaplanis, Advance for the Administrators of the Laboratory, At the Bedside
 It's hard to imagine what point-of-care testing (POCT) would be like if the glucose meter had never been invented and all glucose testing was performed in the main laboratory of the hospital.  more >

Testing/Diagnostics: Point Taken
 Clinical Lab Products - July 2011by Sarah Michaud
Overview of point-of-care testing, technological challenges, and future opportunities.
Point-of-care testing (POCT) technology provides immediate, portable, and convenient medical diagnostics near the site of patient care. POCT's near-instantaneous results allow health care providers to make treatment decisions for their patients in a shorter amount of time compared to traditional laboratory diagnostics. Faster test results translate to rapid treatment for patients—which can save lives in critical care scenarios. More >

Glucose Monitoring Technology
 By Jill Hoffman, ADVANCE for Administrators of the Laboratory; June 6, 2011

Blood glucose monitoring evaluates the concentration of glucose in blood and is a critical component of diabetes mellitus care. Tests are performed by piercing the skin to draw and apply blood to a chemically active test strip. Small handheld devices-glucometers-can measure blood glucose. To get accurate readings, it is important to make sure the glucose meter is operating correctly by applying quality control (QC) material to the strip, often sold separately for home glucometers, says Frederick L. Kiechle, MD, PhD, director of Clinical Pathology, Pathology Consultants of South Broward, Memorial Healthcare System, Hollywood, FL. more >

POC Coag Technology Path: Simple to Savvy
 CAP Today, May 2011, by Brendan Dabkowski

Smart businesses stick to the principle that the customer is always right. For manufacturers of point-of-care coagulation test systems, whose customers are often now individual patients, keeping that principle top of mind is imperative. Offering test systems that help ensure customers/ patients are right—that is, in obtaining accurate coagulation status—protects lives. more >   I   See CAP TODAY’s coagulation analyzers lineup

The Growth of POCT
 By Carlos Prieto-Granada, MD, and James H. Nichols, PhD, DABCC, FACB March 2011 • advance/Laboratory
 

The development of newer technologies and overall improvement of POCT quality has led to an exponential growth in the POCT field. As an emerging, rapidly evolving and ever expanding specialty in laboratory medicine, point-of-care testing (POCT) has been generating a whole new set of issues since its popularization in the late 1980s.  Tconcept of POCT, also known as bedside, near-patient testing and decentralized testing, relates to tests that are conducted by clinical operators at the site of patient care where immediate medical action is taken on the results. The fact that POCT represents a departure from conventional laboratory medicine has created new challenges, especially regarding standardization and regulation.  These topics, including new regulatory changes, glucose meter performance criteria and increasing reliance on transcutaneous POCT methods, are addressed. more >

Preventing Medical Errors
 RFID technology helps identify patient, hardware and staff locations, as well as preventable gaps in care.
By Mayank Trivedi, April 2011 • advance/Laboratory

More than 10 years after the publication of "To Err is Human," few hospitals have successfully heeded the call to cut down the number of fatal medical errors in the United States.  The failure certainly is not due to lack of effort or commitment. Hospitals have published innumerable studies, protocols, and analysis to improve patient safety. But the results have too often fallen short. With increasing clinical workloads and cost pressures, many healthcare organizations have begun to investigate how technologies such as radiofrequency identification (RFID) tags, which "sense" staff and asset locations, can enhance clinical and biomedical workflow. RFID technology can track the physical location of patients, staff, equipment, as well as instruments and pharmaceuticals, helping to increase patient safety. This technology can reduce medical errors in a number of ways. More >

Accuracy above all for POC glucose analyzers - See CAP TODAY’s glucose analyzers lineup

By Brendan Dabkowski, CAP Today, March 2011

Makers of point-of-care glucose testing systems are responding to customers’ demands for devices that are nimble, responsive, and durable—but above all, accurate. “Hospitals continue to demand improved accuracy of bedside glucose monitors as they adopt protocols for better glycemic management,” says Nova Biomedical marketing specialist Rick Rollins.  more >

10 years out, Connectivity Standard Still not in
 CAP Today, February 201, Feature Story, by Anne Ford
By their first birthday, most babies show signs of dental development. But the point-of-care connectivity standard POCT1-A celebrates its 10th anniversary this year, and some say it has yet to start growing teeth. That is, the standard has no enforcing body, and so adoption has been left up to individual vendors, some of whom are not inclined to spend financial resources making their legacy systems compliant with POCT1A.  More >

Too far, Too Fast on ICU TGC?
CAP Today, March 2011, Feature Story, by Anne Paxton
Ten years ago, a study conducted in Leuven, Belgium, took U.S. hospital intensive care units by storm. Reported in the New England Journal of Medicine, the trial, led by Greet Van den Berghe, MD, PhD, found that when adult surgical ICU patients’ blood glucose was maintained between 80 and 110 mg/dL by means of an insulin infusion, it reduced ICU mortality by 42 percent and in-hospital mortality by 34 percent (2001;345:1359–1367). Implementing an ICU protocol of tight glycemic control, the study concluded, also decreased the incidence of acute renal failure, septicemia, and critical illness polyneuropathy.

These conclusions galvanized hospital ICUs. In the wake of the study, “Intensive care units in the U.S. went from almost nobody using insulin to using it on almost every patient,” says Stanley A. Nasraway, MD, director of the surgical intensive care units at Tufts Medical Center, Boston. As one indicator of the impact on laboratory testing, Barnes Jewish Hospital in St Louis, Mo., doubled the number of glucose strips it consumes.

 

“In 2001, we used 250,000 strips a year and we’re at almost half a million strips a year now, just with essentially the same number of beds,” says Mitchell G. Scott, PhD, professor of pathology and immunology and co-medical director of clinical chemistry at Washington University School of Medicine.

But as tight glycemic control (TGC) became more and more the standard for adult patients across the critical care landscape in the U.S., there were ripples of concern. Efforts to duplicate the Leuven study did not all pan out. One of Dr. Van den Berghe’s own later studies in medical ICU patients showed only morbidity benefits. Then, two large-scale studies in 2008 and 2009 suggested that, in fact, very tight glycemic control may actually put patients at greater risk of death and complications from hypoglycemia. more >

Selecting Point-of-Care Devices
Direct patient care professionals are looking for rapid testing options to accelerate diagnoses and treatment plans.
 By Ginger A. Baker, MS, MT(AAB), Posted: January 2011, ADVANCE for Medical Laboratory Professionals

The point-of-care (POC) test and device market has been one area with sustained growth, even in a difficult economic climate. This sector has sustained a 7.5 percent annual growth. Additionally, with the need to reach a diagnosis and treatment plan as quickly as possible, direct patient care professionals are looking for rapid POC testing options. Both factors polarize vendor focus on the POC market. The test options can seem endless at times. In this installment of "At the Bedside," a few key questions and considerations are recommended.

Meeting Electronic Records Needs Like laboratory instruments, POC devices are not all created equal. Each has enhanced options or methodologies that set it apart from the market. The real trick is knowing what information to target and what questions to ask. With the coming HITECH requirements, it is probable that all devices will need to be interfaced to the electronic health record (EHR) and the EHR must have a module to record results and quality control (QC) for manual POC testing. While most devices offer connectivity, all connectivity is not created equally. One only needs to look at bedside glucose testing to get a clear picture on the number of options available. more >

New Go-to Guide for Solving POC Conundrums
 CAP Today, January 2011, Feature Story, by Karen Lusky
 A patient with type 1 diabetes has a 450 mg/dL fingerstick glucose value when tested at a clinic but a 100 mg result when the central lab repeats the test on another specimen. An emergency department physician complains that the ED point-of-care pregnancy test results are suddenly all positive. The Clinical and Laboratory Standards Institute’s new consensus guideline, “Quality Management Approaches to Reducing Errors at the Point of Care,” is aimed at helping labs and health care providers parse and preempt those types of problems and many more. more >

Glycemic Control Economics in the ICU

Scurlock C, Raikhelkar J, Mechanick JI, Curr Opin Clin Nutr Metab Care. 2010 Dec 29. [Epub ahead of print]

Currently the USA has an aging population, with increasing deficits and a healthcare system that most would agree is in need of repair. Finding ways to curtail costs is urgently needed. Attention to glycemic control and metabolic care offers a cost-effective method of treatment to reduce complications. Healthcare-related expenses occupy an expanding portion of gross domestic product in the US and are a driver of the deficit. more >

Glucose Meters in the ICU
By Brad S. Karon, MD, PhD, 14 January 2011 At the bedside: poct - advance/Laboratory
The subject of glucose meter accuracy for use in monitoring critically ill patients on glycemic control protocols has received an incredible amount of attention lately. Some of the issues surrounding this controversy are summarized here. Prior to 2001, the “state of the art” in critical care was to monitor glucose levels in critically ill patients and intervene (with insulin administration) only if glucose levels exceeded 200 mg/dL. In 2001, Van den Berghe and colleagues published the first of their studies on glycemic control.  more

Advances in POCT
POCT will continue to be driven by technology and the need to produce results in a timely manner
By Adetoun Ejilemele, MBBS, FMC Path, FWACP, and Anthony O. Okorodudu, PhD, MBA, DABCC, FACB
ADVANCE for Administrators of the Laboratory, Top 10 Features of 2010
The widespread use of point-of-care testing (POCT) has become feasible thanks to improvements in the ease of use of instruments and enhancements in automation. In many cases, software applications have been incorporated into the instruments to provide automated calibration and quality control. There's also been a shift away from the use of liquid reagents to solid-phase reagents and electrochemical methods. more >

POCT key to widespread access to healthcare
By Harry Glorikian, BA, MBA; Aruna Rajan; and Kerry Xie, Medical Laboratory Observer, January 2011
Decentralization of healthcare is a major trend impacting the delivery of in vitro diagnostics and is driving the need for point-of-care testing/tests (POCT). With fast turnaround times (TAT) and portability to a variety of settings, POCT offers many advantages for disease management. POCT enables migration from core hospital labs to specialty-care units, doctors’ offices, and homes to provide access to healthcare services, thus improving patient compliance, reducing hospital stays, and lowering overall healthcare costs.  more >

CLSI Publishes Quality Practices in Noninstrumented POCT

The Clinical and Laboratory Standards Institute(CLSI) recently published Quality Practices in Noninstrumented Point-of-Care Testing: An Instructional Manual and Resources for Health Care Workers; Approved Guideline (POCT08-A). This instructional guideline delivers laboratory science concepts and activities with the goal of increasing knowledge and quality of laboratory testing for testing personnel with little or no laboratory background. “POCT08-A is designed to make the basic principles of good laboratory practice accessible to all the diverse personnel performing noninstrumented tests at the point of care. It contains discussion and examples of basic practices that support accurate testing, and an extensive set of forms and protocols to use as resources for those managing such testing,” said Sheldon Campbell, MD, PhD, FCAP, Yale University School of Medicine, and chairholder of the subcommittee that created the document. more >

Three Cs of Coagulation Testing
Avoid interferences & find an approach to specimen rejection that works for your lab
By Jill Hoffman, posted December 27, 2010, ADVANCE for Medical Laboratory Professionals
The most common coagulation tests are prothrombin (PT) and activated partial thromboplastin time (aPTT). Physicians will often order PT to determine the degree of blood anticoagulation in patients using anticoagulants or blood thinners such as Warfarin as well as to detect acquired bleeding disorders (e.g., vitamin K deficiency and liver damage). PT is more commonly reported in the International Normalized Ratio unit system. aPTT detects hereditary clotting abnormalities and monitors heparin therapy. Both tests are often ordered in conjunction. more >

More Hospitals Advertise Shorter Patient Wait Times for Emergency Departments
The Dark Report, November 29 2010
New trend pressures clinical pathology laboratories to shorten turnaround times for key lab tests Anyone who says there’s not much competition for patients has ignored the marketing battle among hospitals to attract patients to their emergency departments (EDs). In a growing number of cities, major hospitals now aggressively advertise guarantees of ever-shorter wait times in their EDs. This trend has a direct impact on clinical pathology laboratories because they must improve turnaround time (TAT) on lab test results to support faster patient care in EDs. Using the promise of faster patient access to a doctor in the ED is a fascinating phenomenon. It shows that patients do recognize the difference in service they get from hospitals in their community. more >

The International Normalized Ratio:  A Tool for Monitoring Warfarin Therapy

Warfarin is a widely prescribed oral anticoagulant that acts by inhibiting vitamin K-dependent coagulation factors in blood. Too much warfarin, however, causes bleeding and can even result in death. Therefore, dosage of the drug must be individualized for each patient. To avoid adverse events associated with warfarin such as excessive bleeding, clinicians regularly monitor patients’ anticoagulation status using prothrombin time (PT) and the international normalized ratio (INR). Individuals who are at risk for bleeding while receiving warfarin include the elderly, as well as patients with liver disease, congestive heart failure, or those on hemodialysis. Recent major surgery, malnutrition, hyperthyroidism, and many drugs, including amiodarone (an anti-arrhythmic), also increase the chances of bleeding. Furthermore, there are also important genetic factors that modulate the response to warfarin. Patients with such risk factors may benefit from more frequent monitoring, careful dose adjustment to desired INR, and shorter duration of therapy. Clinicians also commonly use PT and INR to assess patients’ hemostastic systems. more

Report Finds Drop in MRSA Infections

A new report released by the American Medical Association found that the number of invasive healthcare-related methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) infections has decreased among patients with healthcare-associated infections that were acquired in community settings. MRSA infection rates also declined among those with hospital-onset invasive disease. more

Tight Glycemic Control:What Do We Really Know, and  What Should We Expect?

Tight glycemic control has engendered large numbers of investigations, with conflicting results. The world has largely embraced intensive insulin as a practice, but applies this therapy with great variability in the manner of glucose control and measurement.  This commentary reviews what we actually know with certainty from this vast sea of literature, and what we can expect looking forward. more

Exploring the Relationship between Hyperglycemia and Surgical Site Infection

Study Suggests Potential Glycemic Target
AACC Clinical Laboratory Strategies, November 2010, by Genna Rollins
Numerous studies have examined the impact of tight glycemic control in different populations of hospitalized patients, with varying results. Some have found benefits such as reduced surgical site infections (SSI), while others have reported harms like increased mortality. Now, new research examines the impact of perioperative hyperglycemia on the incidence of SSI in general and vascular surgery patients. NOTE: viewing the rest of this article requires AACC membership. more >

Strengthening POCC Support
ADVANCE for Administrators of the Laboratory, November 2010 At the Bedside, by Rebecca Taalbi, point-of-care coordinator, Wheaton Franciscan Healthcare, St. Francis Hospital, Milwaukee, WI.
Do point-of-care (POC) employees belong to nursing or to lab? Who should pay for the oversight? What is fair pay?  These are typical questions from managers and technicians alike.POC coordinators (POCC) are responsible for ensuring that nursing staff perform accurate, error-free lab work but in this role do not work with patient samples. Because of this, some lab employees feel POCCs should be budgeted into nursing staff. They argue that the lab should not accrue a cost to perform oversight that offers no revenue. more >

Packing POC Dossier into  New Online Tool Kit

CAP Today, August 2010, Feature Story, by Anne Ford

It’s often said that to get what you want, you have to identify what you want. And what Eileen Esposito, RN, DNP, wants is more pathologists who are willing to collaborate with colleagues on point-of-care testing. “I want someone who can sit at a table with the end users and not say, ‘You can’t have that point-of-care test,’ but ‘Let’s talk about the test you’re requesting, and let’s talk about its pros and cons,’” says Esposito, assistant executive director of ambulatory patient care services and quality, North Shore-Long Island Jewish Health System, Manhasset, NY, and a consultant to the College’s POC Testing Committee. more

Strengthening Care

By Steven Melnick, PhD, MD, Advance for Administrators of the Lab • Issue 9 • Page 16

At The Bedside Every day, clinical laboratories are faced with an expanding set of challenges in providing timely patient care. Staffing shortages, new technology and increasing demands for accountability from the healthcare industry mean that laboratory directors must routinely implement new patient testing protocols and data management techniques. Point-of-care testing (POCT) is an important component of comprehensive testing in today's laboratories. At Miami Children's Hospital, our laboratory manages, integrates and centralizes POCT information originating from the intensive care units, operating rooms, emergency department (ED), off-site centers and air and ground transport to ensure a continuum of care. more

POCT & AfterGlow Highlights from the AACC Annual Meeting

Bob Kaplanis Awarded POCC of the Year!

Congratulations to Bob Kaplanis from Banner Health in Arizona, second from left above, (with L-R Bill Noble and Brian Gunderson from MAS and Kim Gregory from Mass. General Hospital) who received the CPOCT Division’s Point of Care Coordinator of the Year award at this year’s Annual Meeting. To see photos, click here. Following the Mixer, Rebecca Paw, POC Specialist from Adventist Health in Southern Cal, right, welcomed 200+ people to AfterGlow 2010.  For more photos from AfterGlow, click here,

8th Annual POCC Forum Presentations Now Available

"Records and Regulations in the Age of the EMR" drew a large audience during the Annual Meeting and the presentations are now available for viewing. Click on the title of image below for a pdf of the slides. POCT and the CLIA SURVEY, Gary Yamamoto, Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services San Francisco Regional Office, Preparing for a New Era in Health Care Integrated Electronic Health Records System, Ginger A. Baker, MS, MT (AAB)

Accounting Practices

Build a skillful financial justification for your point of care testing program additions and changes.

August 16, 2010 | By Ginger A. Baker, MS, MT(AAB) ADVANCE for Medical Laboratory Professionals

It has been a difficult time for most. Payer mixes have changed and financial reserves are dwindling. There has never been a more critical need to understand the accounting methods of determining a test's worth and cost. Savvy point of care coordinators(POCCs) or lab managers know point of care tests (POCT) are not as financially friendly as their lab performed counterparts.  More

Connectivity Pitfalls at the Point of Care
By Kim Gregory, MT(ASCP), NCA, ClS, Associate Director, POCT, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, POC CONNECTIVITY CONCEPTS, Advance for Administrators of the Laboratory
In the infancy of point-of-care testing (POCT) the newly deemed POCT coordinator was challenged with the task of creating compliance from chaos using a mountain of paper", and if they were lucky, a laptop containing a data management system for glucose meters fondly referred to as "SneakerNet". Read more >

Blood Glucose Meters: Is FDA Ready to Tighten Up Accuracy Standards?
By Bill Malone, Clinical Laboratory News, May 2010

After a well attended March meeting on blood glucose meters, FDA now has support from stakeholders to work toward a two-track regulatory approach that would distinguish the needs of individuals monitoring diabetes at home versus healthcare professionals maintaining tight glycemic control (TGC) protocols in clinical settings. More >

Lessons from the POCT Front
By Genna Rollins, March 2010 Clinical Laboratory News
 How Can Labs Improve Implementation, Tackle Compliance Challenges?
For at least a decade, point-of-care testing (POCT) has been the darling of the medical diagnostics industry, with sustained growth in testing volume and continual technological breakthroughs. The trend shows no sign of abating, as drivers such as the need for hospitals and clinics to better manage capacity and improve care, coupled with further innovations, are making POCT ever more attractive.

Yet hospitals and health systems continue to experience challenges in implementing and sustaining POCT programs, at times leaving both laboratorians and clinicians frustrated and wary about the process. The reasons for less-than-satisfactory outcomes are as varied as the programs themselves, but experts cite many factors that can make or break a POCT application. More >

POCT Quality
By Anthony O. Okorodudu, PhD, MBA, DABCC, FACB, Advance for Administrators of the Laboratory - Print

The value of POCT is mainly dependent on reducing pre- and post-analytical errors. Click here

Urinalysis at the Point-of-Care
Advance for Administrators of the Laboratory, 0310

Listen in to pieces of an interview from the February print edition of Advance for Administrators of the Laboratory.
Maria Peluso-Lapsley, global commercial marketing manager, Urinalysis, Siemens Healthcare Diagnostics, spoke with ADVANCE for the urinalysis article featured in the February print edition. Click here to hear her talk about some of the benefits of performing urinalysis at the point of care, and learn about the CLINITEK Status family of analyzers from Siemens.

What’s New in POC Glucose Analyzers
By Brendan Dabkowski, CAP Today, February 2010, Feature Story
Sometimes, turning your attention away from the rest of the proverbial forest to care for a specific tree can prove positive. So long as you pick the right tree. For makers of bedside glucose testing systems, the right tree is accuracy. And growing it can yield such benefits as fewer errors, reduced costs, and greater patient safety. “The most significant trend within the marketplace has been for hospitals to demand improved accuracy of bedside glucose monitors as hospitals adopt protocols for better glycemic management of patients,” says Rick Rollins, marketing specialist, Nova Biomedical. Rollins adds that the FDA, American Association of Clinical Endocrinologists, and Society of Critical Care Medicine are calling for enhanced glucose meter accuracy. And as point-of-care glucose testing expands, says Peter Karkantis, general manager of hospital and government, Abbott Diabetes Care, “health care institutions must have assurance that their point-of-care glucose monitoring system provider can deliver consistent accuracy across thousands of glucose analyzers and millions of test strips.” More >

Eye the Basics, Not Baubles,for POCT
CAP Today, January 2010, Feature Story, by Anne Ford
The major gift-giving holidays may be over, but the hankering for new gadgets continues. Just ask point-of-care coordinators, some of whom continue to check their metaphorical stockings for new tests as they plead, “I’ve been a very good coordinator this year. How about, say, a POC molecular assay for respiratory infection?”

But focusing on the new—new assays, new platforms, new bells and whistles—can be detrimental to achieving excellence in your POC program, some experts say. “There’s a lot of tantalizing technology out there that looks really fun but that’s not practical or not indicated,” says Cynthia Foss Bowman, MD, medical director of clinical laboratories and director of POC testing at Long Island Jewish Medical Center, New York. “From my perspective, we should be making the bread-and-butter POC testing better. I don’t want to inhibit technical development, but I would hate to see a barrage of new tests come out without attending to the issues that we’ve got right now.” For example? Not being aware of the limitations of each type of POC test performed in your institution. Reinventing the wheel instead of taking advantage of vendor resources. Letting clinicians dictate which tests are performed at the point of care.  Read more >

Glycemic Control in the Hospital: How Tight?
Nursing, November 2009, By Christine Kessler, RN, ANP, BC-ADM, MN

 

Consider the latest evidence as you explore the controversial issue of glycemic control in critically ill patients. PATIENTS WITH DIABETES are often our most challenging. Although diabetes isn’t usually the reason that patients are admitted to the hospital, it’s the fourth most common co-morbidity. Half of patients with type 1 and 2 diabetes will face surgery in their lifetime. During hospitalization, up to 12% of patients who don’t have a history of diabetes will develop hyperglycemia, which is defined as a fasting blood glucose over 126 mg/dL or a random glucose over 200 mg/dL. Surprisingly, these patients will have a nearly 18-fold increased risk of in-hospital mortality compared with the 3-fold risk experienced by patients known to have diabetes. Recent studies have demonstrated that better glycemic control can greatly reduce mortality, morbidity, and hospital costs.

So how tight should glycemic control in hospitalized patients be? Based on recent studies, the answer to that question remains controversial. More >

POC Glucose Testing in Critically ill Patients

Editorial article from Critical Care Medicine 2009 Vol. 37, No. 10

 

Visual logistics and a glycemic variability hypothesis In this (current) issue of Critical Care Medicine, the paper by Dr. Meynaar et al represents a step in the right direction. It focuses on critically ill patients, presents a systematic approach to glucose meter evaluation, and applies locally smoothed median absolute difference (LS MAD) curves to evaluate bedside testing. LS MAD curves provide compact visual representation of performance by means of “visual logistics”— readily interpretable and clinically relevant graphics that reveal accuracy simultaneously at different decision levels, which for glucose include hypoglycemia, tight glucose control (TGC), hyperglycemia, and critical limits.

 

LS MAD curves facilitate comprehension of performance without lengthy explanation and also show that most glucose meter systems do not provide consistent enough measurements for therapeutic decisions in the extremely high or low glucose range where Dr. Meynaar et al captured too few paired observations to arrive at a conclusion. More >

Perspectives on Cost and Outcomes for POCT
Elizabeth Lee-Lewandrowski, PhD, MPH, Kent Lewandrowski, MD, Research Core Laboratory, Massachusetts General Hospital, Clin Lab Med 29 (2009)

 

Rapid TAT provided by POCT main factor ultimately responsible for improvement in outcomes Point-of-care testing (POCT) is usually more expensive on a unit-cost basis than testing performed in a central laboratory. It is difficult to manage POCT and to maintain regulatory compliance, especially in large institutions... More >

Higher Standards on the Way for Glucose Meters?
By Bill Malone, Clinical Laboratory News, September 2009: Volume 35, Number 9

FDA Seeking ISO Revision to Improve Performance Requirements The FDA will consider tightening standards for strip-based blood glucose meters, echoing the concerns of many in the clinical lab field who have warned for a decade that the meters are not reliable. More >

POC Leader Spreads Winning Ways Far & Wide
CAP Today, September 2009, Feature Story, by Anne Paxton

July 2009 was not a bad month for the point-of-care testing program at Nebraska Methodist Hospital in Omaha. First, the 430-bed hospital earned recognition from the Hospital Compare program sponsored by the Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services, which placed Methodist among the elite two percent of institutions in the nation with the lowest mortality for heart attack patients. Capping that accolade, the American Association for Clinical Chemistry tapped the hospital’s point-of-care coordinator, Brenda Franks, MT(ASCP), for its Point-of-Care Coordinator of the Year Award.

Franks would be the first to say there’s no magic method for a POC testing program to arrive at such a plane, but she has a few words of advice for other POC testing programs. Among them: Get people to focus on the data. Pin down specific ways to reduce errors. Solve problems through coordinated teamwork. And make sure that POC solutions actually address problems you are trying to fix.

Nebraska Methodist’s point-of-care program started out with a slight advantage over most. “When point-of-care glucose testing first became available 20-plus years ago, the laboratory here was privately owned, so we brought it on as a phlebotomy-based program,” Franks says. There was a benefit to that, because every POC glucose performed was put into the patient medical record via the hospital information system.

More >

Avoiding POCT Deficiencies
 Advance for Administrators of the Lab, Kelly J. Graham, Vol. 18 • Issue 9
 

Errors easily arise in point-of-care testing programs; assess yours to maintain efficiency.

A common downside to rapidly changing, developing and improving technologies is a struggle to maintain a high level of efficiency and quality with minimal errors. Point-of-care testing (POCT) is no exception-as more facilities adopt the practice and new platforms and applications become available, common deficiencies in POCT programs may arise. But in the quality-centric healthcare industry, methods for eliminating problems are rarely far behind the identification of a concern. Assess your own POCT program for the deficiencies below and ascertain which improvement measures might work for your facility.

Identifying Common Issues

Peggy Mann, MS, MT(ASCP), POC and Lab/Facility coordinator, University of Texas Medical Branch, Clinic Administration lists a few of the most frequently seen deficiencies as:

  • lack of required competency documentation,

  • lack of required quality control (QC) performance,

  • failure to recognize out-of-range QC values,

  • improper or lack of required instrument maintenance and/or documentation,

  • lack of appropriate personal protective equipment and

  • lack of awareness that testing sites must have appropriate CLIA certificates for the type of testing performed.

More >

Pieces of the POCT puzzle
POC testing: changing the way patient care is delivered
 By Kristin N. Hale, BS, BA, and Gerald J. Kost, MD, PhD, MS, FACB, MLO, June 2009

Point-of-care testing (POCT) is defined as testing at or near the site of patient care. The goal of POCT is to facilitate rapid diagnosis and faster treatment decisions to improve patient care and reduce morbidity and mortality.1 POCT impacts every branch of the healthcare system, including hospitals, outpatients, and disaster and emergency situations. The ability of POCT to be utilized in all these respective locations has demonstrated the significant potential POCT has to positively impact and change the way healthcare is delivered to the patient population — ultimately, with the goal of improving patient care — wherever that may be. More >

Positive Patient Outcomes

The Joint Commission has implemented key changes in 2009 that enhance focus on quality and patient safety.

By Margaret Peck, MS, MT (ASCP) Advance for Admin of the Lab: May 2009

 

Safe, quality patient care is highly dependent on the excellence of laboratory services, yet laboratories quite often rely on external processes and staff that impact its ability to provide timely, quality results. The landmark 1999 Institute of Medicine report To Err is Human stated that 70 percent of laboratory errors occur in the pre- and post-analytical phases of laboratory testing. Therefore, the interface between the clinical laboratory and other care providers can be a crucial part of the entire scope of the provision of lab services. More >

Aiming for Lab-like Accuracy at the Point of Care
 CAP Today, April 2009, Feature Story, By Brendan Dabkowski

American frontiersman and gunslinger Wyatt Earp is credited with the gem “fast is fine, but accuracy is everything.” Though physicians at the point of care are unlikely to find themselves in an Old West-style gunfight, most, like Earp, would choose accuracy over speed. And that means makers of bedside glucose testing systems must be ever vigilant in meeting customers’ requests for improved accuracy.

“The primary need for clinicians using POC glucose monitors is that they give accurate results—even in the presence of interfering substances like maltose, abnormal hematocrit, ascorbate, etc.—so that correct treatment decisions can be made,” says Ron Newby, Nova Biomedical’s director of marketing. Also crucial: obtaining the right glucose read the first time, at the point of care, to eliminate the “time-wasting need for repeat measurements,” he says. Analyzers must deliver results quickly, but without sacrificing accuracy. Hospitals now face the “need to provide even higher levels of accuracy in handheld devices, in effect delivering lab-like accuracy at the bedside,” says Mary Catherine Coyle, MS, MT(ASCP), director of product marketing in the professional diagnostics division of Roche Diagnostics. More >

Win-Win POCT

Scott Warner, MLT(ASCP), ADVANCE for Administrators of the Laboratory
Vol. 18 • Issue 3 • Page 10 At the Bedside

Imagine 10 employees in your small hospital laboratory. Suddenly, there are 30 more performing tests on all shifts, and as a manager you aren't sure if they are fully trained or understand quality control (QC) concepts. This can happen with point-of-care testing (POCT). With diabetes being the sixth leading cause of death1and accounting for 22 percent of hospital charges,2your hospital's POCT program is a crucial part of managing inpatient diabetic care. Your partnership with nursing is the key to success, whether starting from scratch or upgrading an existing program. More

BNP in the Diagnosis of Heart Failure
By Barry I. Bluestein, PhD, MT(ASCP); Normand Despres, PhD; Alexander Belenky, PhD; Farooq Ghani, MD, PhD; and E. Glenn Armstrong, PhD, ADVANCE for Administrators of the Laboratory

Heart failure or congestive heart failure (CHF), when heart failure patients experience a buildup of fluid, is a clinical syndrome characterized by shortness of breath, fatigue and peripheral edema caused by the heart's inability to adequately circulate blood to the body's essential organs. CHF has become so common that it is considered by some to be a new epidemic.1 This dysfunction is associated with coronary artery disease (CAD), chronic hypertension, valvular heart diseases and cardiomyopathies.

The World Health Organization now estimates that 16 million people worldwide are living with some degree of heart failure. Approximately two-thirds of those, according to the National Institutes of Health, will die within five years of their diagnosis. Eighty percent of hospitalized patients age 65 and older are admitted with a diagnosis of CHF, making it the most common diagnosis of hospitalized patients in that age group.2 As a result, more Medicare dollars are spent on heart failure than any other single diagnosis. More

POCT Precision
Accuracy of point-of-care testing devices is proven; educating testing personnel is key.
By David Plaut and Carol Smola, Advance for the Administrators of the Lab

 

Advance for Administrators of the Lab February 2009 issue has a great article on POCT and reports that the demand for POCT is expected to increase by 80 percent over the next three years.  The article states that the market is forecasted to grow from $10.3 billion (2005) to $18.7 billion by 2011. Click here to visit Advance for Administrators of the Laboratory website and then under CURRENT ISSUE, click on the "Log in to View Digital" button. That will take you to a really cool digital version of the publication.

Point-of-Care Sagas: A Tale of Three Cities
CAP Today, January 2009, Feature Story, by Anne Paxton

Baystate Health in Springfield, MA; Mayo Clinic in Rochester, MN: and SUNY Downstate Medical Center in Brooklyn, NY talk about their POC programs...

 

As increasingly complex laboratory tests start being performed rapidly at the bedside and elsewhere, the steady migration of testing from central laboratory to the point of care seems inexorable. But laboratory managers and directors in many care settings can confirm that, when point-of-care testing is adopted too hastily, it can be a case of the technology tail wagging the diagnostic testing dog.

At Baystate Health in Springfield, Mass., for example, “We do a complex menu of point-of-care testing, and we’re dealing with dozens of sites, hundreds of devices, and thousands of operators,” says James H. Nichols, PhD, DABCC, FACB, director of clinical chemistry. Sometimes, “physicians say ‘I need POC testing,’ and think it’s going to solve all the problems of the world—when in fact it can just throw another wrench of technology into an already overburdened system.” Read more >

New Glycohemoglobin Standard: Will Estimated Average Glucose Boost Patient Understanding?

By John R. Bell, Clinical Laboratory News, October 2008: Volume 34, Number 10

 

Despite the widespread use of HbA1c as a clinical measurement of patients’ diabetes control, standardization of test results has been a challenge for labs. The National Glycohemoglobin Standardization Program took the first step 12 years ago when it initiated a program to standardize HbA1c measurements on the basis of the Diabetes Control and Complications Trial, results of which were published in 1993. Read more >

Consensus from Endocrinologists on Prediabetes Testing

Lab Tests Online, October 2008


New guidelines from two major endocrinology organizations recommend strategies for diagnosis and management of prediabetes, a condition that occurs when blood glucose levels are higher than normal but not elevated enough to warrant a diagnosis of type 2 diabetes. The guidelines are an extension of efforts to detect and treat type 2 diabetes earlier and more aggressively, according to AACE. They aim to help physicians recognize prediabetes, those at risk for developing full-blown diabetes, and to make treatment decisions to prevent diabetes and ameliorate many of its risk factors. These include unhealthy weight, high blood pressure, and elevated lipid levels. Read more >

Putting Hospital Data to Hospital-wide Use
 July 2008, CAP Today, Feature Story, Anne Paxton

 

Implementing a tight glycemic control protocol in the hospital should be straightforward: Monitor blood glucose levels, assess how well they’re meeting target ranges, use the information to improve, and reap the benefits in shorter lengths of stay and lower mortality and costs. But even when hospital staff are eager to comply with the protocol, the challenge of getting the right data together can hamper hospitals’ ability to benefit from tight glycemic control, or TGC. More >

POCT in the ED Enables Quicker Treatment
Clinical Lab Products

 

Patient side point-of-care testing -- where diagnostic testing is conducted at or near the site of the patient -- enables doctors to make decisions on patients presenting with chest pain up to 20 minutes faster than those whose lab tests are evaluated by a standard lab, according to a study appearing this month in the peer-reviewed journal Annals of Emergency Medicine. More >

Platform Consolidation in Critical Care
Advance for the Administrators of the Lab POC Connectivity, October 2008 By Brad Karon, MD, PhD

Recent consolidation of testing platforms has been driven by two factors—increasing evidence for improved patient care outcomes for analytes such as glucose, lactate and creatinine and the desire to use a single platform in multiple patient care settings. Read more >

 

Stuck in the Middle of Middleware
By Deborah Levenson, May 2008, Clinical Laboratory News

 

Labs Look for Answers as New Consortium Aims to Untangle the Mess
 Mention “middleware” in a room full of lab directors, and you are likely to hear varied definitions of what it is and a wide array of uses for it. But generally speaking, the term has come to describe any hardware and software that acts as an intermediary between instruments and lab information systems (LIS) and allows them to exchange data or perform data management tasks the LIS can’t.

 

Middleware’s popularity took off in the early 1990s when personal computers that generated reports and buffered results became more common. Since then, middleware has become mainstream in POCT and a common, relatively inexpensive solution for core labs grappling with a wide range of problems including shortages of med techs, increases in test volume, more complex devices and lab operations, a federal push for electronic health records, and an overall trend toward ensuring quality of care.

 

Connectivity Success

Two major data management systems for POCT now comply with the CLSI’s connectivity standard, easing the transfer of data in institutions with labs that use these systems from Telcor (Lincoln, Neb.) and Medical Automation Systems (Charlottesville, Va.). Connectivity enabled by the standard and compliant systems not only improves patient care, but also eases billing and compliance documentation.

 

With the forthcoming IICC standard, core labs may one day enjoy the sort of connectivity POC users and lab staff at Carolinas Medical Center-NorthEast in Concord, N.C. now have. With the aid of her RALS+ system from Medical Automation Systems and its ability to connect to Roche Accuchek Inform glucose meters, Laboratory Education and POC Coordinator Deb Norkett, MT, ASCP has seen marked improvements in compliance and billing. She interfaces all manual tests through the Accucheck, which also allows her to enter pregnancy test results. After taking advantage of that function, she now achieves a 100% billing rate, while in the past she grappled with a 15% deficit in billing because of lack of documentation in the emergency room.

 

“Before using RALS, we couldn’t capture figures on the volume of certain manual tests, so they were built into the room charge,” she recalled. Click here for more >

 

Never Give In - Fighting for POC Patient Safety
Cap Today, June 2008, Feature Story  By Anne Ford

 

In grammar school, the “three Rs” still hold sway (or so we all hope). But in point-of-care testing, there’s just one R that matters: Relentless. It’s a word that comes up over and over again in conversation with hospital POC testing coordinators—yes, even more often than “specimen” or “CLIA.”

 

“People pretty much know I’m relentless about certain things,” says Tim Deen, MLT(ASCP), MT (HEW), POC testing manager at Medical City Hospital, Dallas. “My chief nursing officer has kindly referred to me as a ‘tough-love’ type of person.”  More >

 

In that regard he has a lot in common with Deb Phaup, BS (MT), MT(ASCP), CLS (NCA, POC coordinator at Mount Auburn Hospital, Cambridge, Mass. “I’m relentless,” she admits, laughing.

 

POC testing safety is nothing to joke about
Personable as Deen and Phaup are, they know that POC testing safety is nothing to joke about. With thousands of POC tests performed in their hospitals each month, theirs is not exactly a sit-back-and-relax situation. With their colleague Joann Bauwens, BS(MT), MT(ASCP), MA(HSM), interim director of laboratory services and POC testing coordinator at SSM St. Mary’s Health Center, St. Louis, Mo., they provide insight into what keeps POC testing on the safe side.

 

Both Deen and Phaup assumed their POC responsibilities just over a decade ago, when bedside testing wasn’t as frequently conducted or as closely regulated as it is now. When Deen began, he says, Medical City Hospital’s point-of-care program was “a lax system, where the lab was not involved.” And at Mount Auburn Hospital, where the POC coordinator position was created for Phaup, “nobody even knew what POC testing was,” she says. “The first week I started the job, I came into work and the then-manager ­didn’t even know where to put me. I was just standing in the hall without a clue.” 

Click here for more>

 

Putting POCT in good hands
CAP Today, April 2008, Feature Story

Waived testing? Wave goodbye to that, says William A. Rock Jr., MD, medical director of the clinical laboratory, University Hospitals and Clinics, University of Mississippi Medical Center, Jackson, who did just that when he began putting together a point-of-care testing program for his institution a decade ago. Today, he and three other colleagues run an extensive POCT program that involves 61 sites and more than 2,000 employees at three hospitals and a large outpatient clinic—all without relying on the waived tests that typically anchor POCT programs.

Waived tests are somewhat oddball actors in the highly ordered, detail-driven world of laboratory medicine. Though regulated, these tests fall short on full commitment, like the Sondheim character in “Company” who sings, “Marry me a little.” So simple are these tests, the FDA has cleared them for home use, and CLIA requires test users to follow only manufacturers’ instructions. No proficiency testing, no patient test management, no quality assurance, no quality control, and no personnel qualifications. For Dr. Rock and his colleagues, it was also a no-go. At UMMC, they decided, the POCT program would be built to last. Any test supported in the POC program, even if CLIA has given it waived status, would have to meet CAP and Joint Commission guidelines. Click here for more.

 

Bedside Tests Can Speed Results, Ease Crowded ERs
The Tennessean. 07/15/08

It used to take emergency physicians at Middle Tennessee Medical Center an hour and a half to get back results from a blood test. That changed to only a few minutes three months ago when the hospital bought equipment that allows tests to be done at a patient's bedside. 

 

The Murfreesboro hospital is one of several in the Nashville area moving to point-of-care testing, which a Vanderbilt professor's research calls part of the solution to relieve emergency room overcrowding.

At many hospitals, tests are sent to labs in another part of the building and certain results might take as long as an hour and a half to get back to the physician. That can sometimes delay initial treatment and push back other tests, such as X-rays that won't be scheduled until those initial results are returned. That, in turn, may keep beds occupied that otherwise could go to other patients. Soon, Middle Tennessee Medical Center plans to add pregnancy and urine tests to those performed at the bedside, a development made possible by the availability of smaller, less costly testing units and improved technology.

"It's been one of the biggest accelerators of our patient flow," said Dr. Kevin H. Beier, an emergency physician who also practices at Baptist Hospital here and is chairman of governmental affairs for the American Academy of Emergency Medicine. Vanderbilt, meanwhile, is considering putting a small lab within its adult emergency department or buying some of the small portable testing devices already on the market.

Overcrowding on rise

 

The move follows a study by Dr. Alan Storrow, associate professor of emergency medicine, that suggested putting labs or machines that determine results closer to a patient's bedside can help solve overcrowding in emergency rooms and perhaps free up bed space in the main hospital more quickly. "We could see a great deal more patients in less time because we're able to get our labs back in a much more time-efficient manner," Storrow said.

 

Overcrowding has become more of an issue as hospitals begin to see sicker patients, some of whom don't seek care until their medical problem gets worse because of a lack of insurance. Every other day, at least one Nashville-area hospital sends patients elsewhere because of a lack of room in departments such as the ER and the critical care unit. Although Vanderbilt — where the adult and pediatric emergency departments combined see 100,000 patients a year — recently doubled its ER capacity to 46 beds, overcrowding still occurs.

One barrier to adopting point-of-care testing is that it often costs less to process batches of tests in a larger main hospital or central lab, Storrow said. "There has to be a balance between cost and improvements in efficiency.

Speeding Toward Real Time with POC Glucoses
CAP Today, March 2008, Feature Article
 

In the case of wireless setups for point-of-care glucose testing, do results arrive in the electronic medical record in real time or "real time"? And how important is that distinction?

To back up a moment: As reported in the October 2007 issue of CAP TODAY ("Wireless Glucose Results-The Latest in Real-Time Data"), the University of North Carolina Hospitals, Chapel Hill, has implemented LifeScan's OneTouch DataLink system to greatly shorten the length of time it takes to obtain, view, and track point-of-care blood glucose results on clinical workstations, laboratory IT systems, and even physicians' PDAs. Other institutions are gradually following suit.

The LifeScan system speeds glucose result delivery by using a wireless unit to transmit data from Life­Scan's OneTouch Flexx meter into the electronic medical record rather than requiring point-of-care staff to take the meter to a docking station for upload. Here's what some consider the sticking point: The wireless unit is external, meaning the user must connect it to the meter with a serial cable before connectivity can be established.

True, the LifeScan wireless unit is stored in the same carrying tote that holds the meter. But it's still an external solution."It's not real-time wireless," says James H. Nichols, PhD, DABCC, FACB, who, as a member of the Connectivity Industry Consortium, helped create the POCT1-A connectivity standard for point-of-care devices in 2001.

Dr. Nichols is medical director of chemistry at Baystate Health, Springfield, Mass., and associate professor of pathology at Tufts University School of Medicine, Boston. "It's a stepping stone on the way to real time, but it's not there yet. It's not like you have the device in your hand, you push the button to scan the patient, and it communicates wirelessly with your server. It still has that limitation of intermittent transmitting." Click here for more >

Integrating POCT In the ED

POC Connectivity Concepts, Advance for the Administrators of the Lab, Vol. 17 •Issue 2 • Page 9 By Valerie L. Ng, PhD, MD; R. Clayton Hooper, RN; Ruth Pfeiffer, RN; Mary N. Clancy, MS, CLS; and Eberhard Fiebig, MD

 

You can't get much more diametrically opposed cultures than that of the ED and the laboratory. The laboratory culture is one of careful and methodical processes and quality systems designed to ensure high-quality results and meet regulatory requirements. The ED culture is one of speed, algorithmic medical practice and rapid reflexive actions necessary to save lives in emergencies; regulatory compliance tasks are often an afterthought.

 

Ironically, many ED interventions rely on accurate laboratory test results. Point-of-care testing (POCT) results in the ED must, by definition, be of the highest quality and always correct because clinical action will be taken immediately based on the test result.

Why has POCT become so important for the ED? The backdrop is the unraveling of the healthcare system, driving many uninsured and sick patients without primary care access to the ED for routine or urgent (but not emergency) medical care.  Click here for more >

 

Nurses on Point-of-Care IT Usage: Study
 By: Jean DerGurahian/ HITS staff writer; Modern Healthcare Online Posted: January 4, 2008 - 5:59 am EDT

An increase on patient safety issues, higher healthcare costs and labor shortages are driving hospitals to use more information technology at the point of care; however, some devices and technology are more cumbersome than helpful, according to a new study of nurses and their bedside treatment practices.

 

The Point of Care Computing for Nursing study, conducted by Spyglass Consulting Group, shows that healthcare facilities are making "significant investments" in clinical information systems so that nurses and other practitioners can access patient information near or at the point of care. Nurses are using fixed or mobile devices to search different applications that help them treat their patients, according to the report, Spyglass spent four months interviewing more than 100 nurses across the healthcare fields for its study.  

It found that 86% of acute-care nurses and 94% of home health nurses interviewed are using devices to access reference materials—including drug databases, manuals and medical calculators—and make informed patient decisions. While nurses spend nearly half their time documenting their treatments, 78% of nurses record their care at the patient's bedside through IT applications, in efforts to cut down on first writing the information on paper and then transferring it to electronic reports, according to the study. Another timesaver has been the use of automated products to capture vital signs data for high-acuity patients, immediately present it for nursing review and automatically upload it to the patient’s electronic record, with 36% of nurses adopting this practice. Bar coding also has helped nurses reduce medical errors. More than half the nurses interviewed—53%—said that they use devices to ensure positive patient identification, medication administration, blood transfusion verification and laboratory specimen collection, according to the report.

 

Nurses are spending time on the Internet as well to stay up-to-date on nursing trends and new treatments, according to the report. "Nurses discovering online nursing communities and resources enabling them to communicate and collaborate with colleagues more effectively," Spyglass said in its report. While nurses seem ready to embrace point-of-care technology, they also say devices currently available are cumbersome and difficult to move with, and networks are unreliable, according to the report. "Point-of-care solutions need to evolve to provide higher levels of synchronization and integration of hardware, software and infrastructure to streamline nursing workflow process and improve communications amongst care team members," Spyglass said.

Content for Point of Care Computing for Nursing was derived from more than 100 interviews with nurses working in acute-care and ambulatory environments nationwide. Spyglass conducted the telephone interviews over a four-month period beginning April 2007.

Wireless glucose results - latest on real-time data

More than a decade after tight glycemic control made its debut in the early 1990s, numerous studies, and recommendations from organizations such as the American Association of Clinical Endocrinologists and the American Diabetes Association, have affirmed its ability to decrease everything from mortality and comorbidity to the risk of heart failure and organ damage. But from a point-of-care testing coordinator's point of view, tight glycemic control increases a few things, too.

A few? Make that 1,000—the approximate number of glucose results that point-of-care staff at University of North Carolina Hospitals, Chapel Hill, manage every day. After UNC implemented a TGC protocol a few years ago, "the first thing that I noticed as a point-of-care person was that it required more glucose meters and testing strips, and more data was being generated," says Beverly Robertson, MPH, MT (ASCP), until recently UNC's point-of-care testing coordinator and now a technical service representative for Somerset, NJ-based in Ventiv Health and an authorized installer of LifeScan equipment. In addition to reviewing and charting a greatly increased number of glucose results, the new TGC protocol meant that Robertson was faced with managing more frequent data downloads and data flow bottlenecks. Not only were there more results to deal with, but "all those results were being hand-charted," Robertson says. "And the only way that physicians could review them was to be physically at the nursing locations." In a large institution like UNC, which has 750 beds, 100 units, and nine ICUs, that meant relying on what Connie Bishop, MT (ASCP) SH, UNC assistant administrative director of core laboratories and point-of-care testing, laughingly terms the "sneaker network."  Click here for more>

 

The Challenges of Point-of-Care Connectivity
How A New Tool Can Aid Labs with Device and Data System Purchasing
By Deborah Levenson, Clinical Laboratory News, July 2007

 

Point-of-care testing (POCT) devices with the ability to link to each other and lab information systems (LISs)—known as connectivity—can help reduce medical errors, improve staff compliance with regulatory requirements, boost revenue from testing, and track wasted supplies. In most labs, POCT connectivity has come a long way from the 1990s, when many POCT devices lacked essentials such as ports that allowed them to transfer results to a lab data management system or ports with keypads for data entry. In those early days, a few manufacturers offered instruments that allowed labs to move data from the device to a patient’s chart, but each had its own suite of products, necessitating multiple computers to handle data.

Today, while issues with POCT connectivity are not as troublesome, labs often fall short of the ultimate goal of using such devices: fast, complete transfer of accurate information.

Click here for more >

 

Utilization of a Computerized Intravenous Insulin Infusion Program to Control Blood Glucose in the Intensive Care Unit

Rattan Juneja, Corbin Roudebush, Nilay Kumar, Angela Macy, Adam Golas, Donna Wall, Cheryl Wolverton, Deborah Nelson, Joni Carroll, Samuel J. Flanders. Diabetes Technology & Therapeutics. Jun 2007, Vol. 9,

No. 3: 232-240

 

This proof of concept study was designed to evaluate the safety and effectiveness of an intravenous insulin dosing calculator, the Clarian GlucoStabilizer™ program, and to determine the feasibility of its use as part of a glycemic control program. This paper discusses the impact of the GlucoStabilizer program on the glycemic control of intensive care patients with hyperglycemia.

Patients admitted to the intensive care unit (ICU), requiring intravenous insulin, were treated using the GlucoStabilizer program. This program calculates an insulin drip rate based on the low and high blood glucose (BG) levels of the desired target range, the patient's current and previous BG levels, and an insulin sensitivity factor, with a goal of safely and expeditiously achieving and maintaining the patient's BG in the target range.

From October 2004 through March 2006, the GlucoStabilizer program has been used to treat 2,398 patients in the ICUs, with 177,279 BG measurements in its database.

For more on this study, or to request a copy, click here.

 

Intensive Insulin Protocol Improves Glucose Control and Is Associated with a Reduction in Intensive Care Unit Mortality

Charles C Reed, BSN, Ronald M Stewart, MD, FACS, Michele Sherman, BSN, John G Myers, MD, FACS, Michael G Corneille, MD, FACS, Nanette Larson, BSN, Susan Gerhardt, MSN, Randall Beadle, BSN, Conrado Gamboa, MS, RPh, Daniel Dent, MD, FACS, Stephen M Cohn, MD, FACS, Basil A Pruitt Jr, MD, FACS. American College of Surgeons, 2007
 

Intensive insulin therapy to maintain serum glucose levels between 80 and 110 mg/dL has previously been shown to reduce mortality in the critically ill; recent data, however, have called this benefit into question.


In addition, maintaining uniform, tight glucose control is challenging and resource demanding. We hypothesized that, by use of a protocol, tight glucose control could be achieved in the surgical trauma intensive care unit (STICU), and that improved glucose control would be beneficial. During the study period, a progressively more rigorous approach to glucose control was used, culminating in an implemented protocol in 2005.


We reviewed STICU patients’ blood glucose levels, measured by point-of-care testing, from 2003 to 2006.Mortality was tracked over the course of the study, and patient charts were retrospectively reviewed to measure illness and injury severity.

 

For the results of this study, click here to access the pdf file.

CAP Today April 2007 Feature Story
Glucose Test Frequency Spawns New Analyzer Needs
 By Anne Ford

In dieting—as in so much else—good intentions aren’t enough. To lose weight, calorie-counters can’t stock up on carrot sticks and hope for the best; they have to actually monitor their diet via a food diary or some other method. (Hence the saying: “If you bite it, write it.”) But if the monitoring method becomes too cumbersome, it’s likely to go by the wayside, and any new, healthier eating habits will probably follow. Conversely, making the monitoring process as painless as possible is a major step toward success. And that’s a lesson that applies to many endeavors, including tight glycemic control.

“Because of the increased testing frequency mandated by most tight glycemic control protocols,” says LifeScan marketing manager Grant Choe, “anything we can do to increase ease and simplicity is going to be welcomed with open arms.” Harlan Polishook, Nova Biomedical marketing communications manager, agrees: Under tight glycemic control protocols, he says, some nurses find themselves performing bedside glucose testing “as frequently as every half hour for some patients.” In turn, “more frequent bedside testing has driven the demand for faster, easier testing and smaller blood volumes.”

The makers of the bedside glucose testing systems featured in this month’s instrumentation survey have responded to that demand with new and forthcoming instruments and features, from multiple measuring wells to wireless capabilities. Click here for more >

 

Industry Overview
Surprise, We’re Here! Gearing up for unannounced inspections
By Renee DiIulio  

 

In 2004, deficiencies at Maryland General Hospital (MGH) in Baltimore brought oversight attention to the process of laboratory accreditation and inspections. The title of a resulting Government Accountability Office (GAO) report, published in June 2006, summarizes the result: “Clinical Labs: CMS and Survey Organization Oversight Is Not Sufficient to Ensure Lab Quality.” Something had to change. Congressmen called for a switch to unannounced inspections. At the same time, the Joint Commission on Accreditation of Healthcare Organizations (JCAHO), Oakbrook Terrace, Ill, was in the process of altering its accreditation process, implementing a plan named Shared Visions—New Pathways, which became effective January 1, 2004.

 

“In 2004, JCAHO announced its intent to implement unannounced surveys in 2006 as part of our Shared Vision—New Pathways effort,” says Margaret Peck, MS, MT(ASCP), the organization’s director of the lab accreditation program. The goal was to provide a more accurate picture of a laboratory’s day-to-day function. “It would allow our accreditation process to be used as a systems improvement tool,” Peck says.

 

College of American Pathologists (CAP) followed suit, influenced, says R. Bruce (RB) Williams, MD, pathologist and head of CAP’s accreditation committee, by the concern of the GAO and Congress. “We are continually improving our lab accreditation process, and we underwent a systemic review following MGH,” he says. A subsequent bill—HR 686: Clinical Laboratory Compliance Improvement Act of 2005, introduced by Rep Elijah Cummings (D-Md)—aims to make unannounced inspections a requirement if passed.

 

Click here for more >

CAP Today, April 2006, Feature Story
When POC Connects the Data, Everyone Wins
 By Sue Parham

The story of point-of-care connectivity is quickly becoming one of laboratory medicine’s twice-told tales: POC setups have come a long way, and hospitals are reaping the benefits. For Debra Norkett, MT (ASCP), education coordinator for the laboratory and point-of-care coordinator at NorthEast Medical Center, a 457-bed hospital in Concord, NC, incorporating POC test data into an electronic patient record system is the ultimate goal. “Our hospital is working toward having electronic patient records, and theoretically, point-of-care connectivity has been set up to support such a system,” she says.

NorthEast Medical Center implemented POC connectivity about three years ago, beginning with the installation of a positive patient identification system that uses bar-coded patient wristbands in conjunction with bar-coded POC instrument operator badges to capture the data from each encounter that involves a POC test. “The success of our POC connectivity is tied into our bar-code system. The bar-coded wristbands and badges have enabled us to reduce patient misidentification errors, as well as automate POC test ordering and result reporting,” Norkett says. Since bar coding became part of the POC process at NorthEast, patient identification errors have dropped to below one percent.

Because NorthEast installed its vendor-neutral Rals-Plus POC data-management system at the same time it implemented its positive patient identification system, POC connectivity has always been enabled by the bar-code system. “I took the job of POC coordinator a few years before we implemented POC connectivity. Then, we had about 30 glucose meters and I would carry a laptop from unit to unit and actually download the information,” Norkett recalls. “At the time, it took so long to gather the data that report generation was always about a month after the fact.”

Click here for more >

 

CAP Today, March 2006, Cover Story
 Nearing High Tide on Low Blood Sugars
 By Anne Paxton

 

Since its emergence in the early 1990s, tight glycemic control could almost have been called an orphan protocol. Despite evidence that it sharply lowers patient mortality and morbidity and hospital length of stay, the use of insulin to keep patient's blood glucose at or near normal levels has spread slowly beyond a few pockets of fervent support, and has yet to sweep the nation's hospitals. As Curtiss B. Cook, MD, associate professor of medicine in the Division of Endocrinology at Mayo Clinic Arizona puts it: "A lot of people haven't quite bought into the concept yet."

But in recent weeks, with a major new controlled study and a public statement from leading professional associations in diabetes care, tight glycemic control may have reached its tipping point. The American Association of Clinical Endocrinologists and the American Diabetes Association are now advocating widespread adoption of tight glycemic control protocols not only in intensive care units but also in other areas of the hospital. Their position statement, released Feb. 1, calls for implementing "structured protocols for aggressive control of blood glucose in both intensive care units and other hospital settings."

 

One day later, Belgian researchers led by Greet Van den Berghe, MD, PhD, reported in the New England Journal of Medicine (354:449-461) that intensive insulin therapy, or tight glycemic control, significantly reduced morbidity among all patients in the medical ICU—a benefit that was demonstrated earlier on patients in surgical ICUs.

Click here for more >

 

Avoiding Glucose Monitoring Errors in Patients Receiving Other Sugars

FDA issued a reminder about the potential for falsely elevated glucose readings in patients who are also receiving products that contain other sugars. These products include oral xylose, parenterals that contain maltose or galactose, and peritoneal dialysis solutions that contain icodextrin.

A patient recently died because of this problem. His glucose readings were very high, so he was given aggressive insulin treatment. The glucose readings were falsely high, however, and too much insulin was administered. The patient suffered irreversible brain damage and died. In this case the glucose meter was reading the patient's actual blood glucose level, plus the maltose that was contained in the IV immune globulin he was receiving. The readings were falsely elevated because the glucose monitoring device couldn't distinguish between glucose and other sugars. All glucose meters don't suffer from this problem. There are four kinds of enzymatic glucose monitoring methods that are used, and only one of those has this problem. This problem occurs only with the monitoring method that uses an enzyme called GDH-PQQ. This method is employed in some glucose monitoring devices used by diabetics at home and in point-of-care settings.

The other three test methods currently used in glucose monitoring systems are called GDH-NAD, glucose oxidase, and glucose hexokinase, and they are capable of distinguishing between glucose and other sugars. The test method used in glucose meters is identified in the package insert that comes with the glucose test strips. The package insert is also available from the manufacturer. The most important thing to remember is not to use the GDH-PQQ method if the patient recently received other sugars. That includes oral xylose for a D-Xylose absorption test, or an IV solution containing maltose or galactose, or a peritoneal dialysis solution containing icodextrin. Click here for more >

 

Additional Information:
FDA MedWatch Safety Alert 2005 - Parenteral Maltose/Parenteral Galactose/Oral Xylose-Containing Products:

Major Medical Associations Call for Better Blood Glucose Management in Hospitalized Patients

 

WASHINGTON, DC – February 1, 2006 – The American Association of Clinical Endocrinologists (AACE), American College of Endocrinology (ACE – the scientific and educational arm of AACE) and the American Diabetes Association (ADA) have joined forces to develop strategies for management of adult  patients with high blood glucose (sugar) in hospitals. Co-sponsored by ten other major medical associations, AACE and ADA released a new position statement today on improving inpatient glycemic control at a joint consensus conference.

 

Awareness about the importance of glycemic control in the hospital setting has increased as result of the ACE Consensus Development Conference on Inpatient Diabetes and Metabolic Control in 2003.  In order to suggest a plan for better care, AACE and ADA came together to conduct the “Improving Inpatient Diabetes Care: A Call to Action Conference - Consensus Development Conference,” January 30 and 31, 2006 in Washington, DC.
Click here for more >

 

Tight Glucose Control Cuts Heart Disease by Half in Type 1 Diabetes
 Published by the U.S. Dept. of Health and Human Services - NIH News

 

Intensive glucose control lowers the risk of heart disease and stroke by about 50 percent in people with type 1 diabetes, researchers report in the December 22, 2005, issue of the New England Journal of Medicine. Their findings are based on a follow-up study of patients who took part more than a decade ago in the Diabetes Control and Complications Trial (DCCT) www.diabetes.niddk.nih.gov/dm/pubs/control/index.htm, a major clinical study funded by the National Institutes of Health (NIH).

 

“We see a greater reduction in cardiovascular events from intensive blood glucose control than from drugs that lower blood pressure and cholesterol,” said Saul Genuth, M.D, of Case Western University. Genuth chairs the follow-up study of DCCT participants, called the Epidemiology of Diabetes Interventions and Complications (EDIC) study, which is examining the long-term effects of prior intensive versus conventional blood glucose control.

 “The benefits of intensive control strongly reinforce the message that this therapy should begin as early as possible and be maintained as long as possible.” Click here for more >

 

Opening up the throttle on POC-hospital connectivity
CAP Today, December 2005, Feature Story By Anne Paxton

 

For point-of-care testing managers, true connectivity is now within reach, which means tantalizing efficiencies lie ahead. POC departments are aligning their connectivity solutions with hospital wide moves to sharpen treatment protocols and become paperless and wireless. For many POC testing programs, the integration of it all is complicated by the demand for bedside testing—and its brisk growth.

Six hospitals, three outpatient clinics, and seven nursing homes make up Sentara Healthcare in the Hampton Roads area of Virginia. Employing 300 glucose meters and about 170 i-Stats, the Sentara system now does well over 1 million POC tests a year, says Lou Ann Wyer, MT(ASCP), POC testing clinical specialist with Sentara Laboratories. Like many other health systems, Sentara has seen a sharp increase in glucose testing because all units are using tight glycemic protocols.

 

Wyer's chief project now is rolling out troponin testing in the emergency department. "For this test there was a lot of up-front work to be done. It's been a long process, including extensive evaluation of the cartridge—an i-Stat product—and making sure physicians are comfortable with the method and how to interpret results, because they don't match the main laboratory results. They have different cutoff values." Click here for more >

 

Connective issue: Linking POC with Wireless Hospitals
CAP Today, November 2005, Feature Story By Anne Paxton

 

Most point-of-care testing managers are thrilled with the new devices and software available to streamline their operations. But with connectivity becoming standard operating procedure, POC testing programs are facing a new challenge: making sure that connectivity meshes with hospitalwide initiatives to adopt new treatment paradigms, eliminate patient ID errors, and eventually say goodbye to cables and wires, as well as to paper. Whether their programs are in a state of steady expansion or extreme makeover, POC testing managers say the possible efficiencies now in view or just around the corner are tantalizing.

 

How are they turning the visionary schemes into smooth-functioning routines?

At Lewis-Gale Medical Center, Salem, Va., connectivity is fairly well established. “We have three different connectivity solutions,” says point of care coordinator John La Rosa, MA, CLS (NCA).  “Biosite Census connectivity for cardiac markers has been in place since 2001, we’ve had the Roche Diagnostics glucose meters on RALS-Plus since 2002, and Abbott Central Data Station for the i-Stats just started this summer.”

The laboratory and hospital information systems are from Meditech. The software updates are included in the hospital’s three- to five-year contracts with the vendors, and may be carried out remotely if the vendors have access to the hospital’s network.


“The big plus of connectivity is it allows us to capture billing that wasn’t captured before, and make sure we are billing to the correct account or patient. We are billing and getting reimbursed wherever we can,” La Rosa says.

 

Tight glycemic control is the hot topic of 2005 in his region, he says, because the evidence shows that keeping patient blood sugar under a certain benchmark prevents some infections, raises postoperative wound healing rates, and reduces length of stay.
“This year we kicked up tight glycemic control where we monitor blood sugars every hour on patients on insulin drip. Right now we just have TGC in critical areas, but when we move it out to the whole hospital, we expect glucose testing to go up quite a bit.”  Click here for more >

 

Outpatient Setting: Alternatives to Connectivity
 Vol. 14 •Issue 11 • Page 10 November 2005 Advance for Administrators of the Lab - AT THE BEDSIDE By Peggy Mann, MS, MT(ASCP)

 

Maintaining a unified point-of-care (POC) program across a university-based hospital system can prove challenging to coordinators responsible for compliance oversight. If a process is designed without regard to the differences between in-patient, campus-based, out-patient clinics, and remote off-site provider offices, it increases the chance that the target or goal will not be met.

 

One striking disparity between on- and off-campus sites is how campus-based services are delivered. An example at our institution of how distance complicates standardization of POC across an enterprise is delivery of reagents from a campus materials department. Another example is the impracticality of operators traveling to campus for observation check-offs available to on-campus operators. A third example is establishing the need for connecting the POC devices in use across the enterprise. In light of the financial burden to connect, what benefits make it worth an off-site clinic finding the money if they have to fund their participation? Are there alternative ways to manage a POC program? Click here for more >

 

A Tight Glycemic Control Initiative
 June 2005 • Advance for Administrators of the Lab • At the Bedside: By Nicole Woody, MT(ASCP)

 

 Tight Glycemic Control (TGC) should qualify as the 2005 phrase of the year. TGC is everywhere in the health care literature, Web casts, listservs and continuing education programs. A Google search of the term yields over 30,000 hits. My experience with TGC began in November 2004, when a glycemic taskforce convened to discuss glycemic control in the hospital. The taskforce was made up of physicians, nurses, dietitians, laboratory professionals, information services employees and pharmacists.

 

Four Basic Groups The taskforce's first assigned duty was to identify existing patient safety issues with glycemic control and prioritize those issues. To accomplish this, the task force was broken into four work groups. The groups included nursing, laboratory/devices, dietary and pharmacology. Nursing looked at the various issues concerning TGC and its impact on the staff. Dietary looked at the food we were serving our patients. Pharmacology looked at many issues, including the types of insulin we use and dextrose concentrations used for intravenous drips. Finally, the laboratory/devices group looked at our existing point-of-care (POC) glucose testing meters, who uses the meters, staff education and the number of meters in use.

The first phase of the task force went relatively well. There were meetings every other week to discuss and work through the issues that arose. A protocol was developed for use in the Cardiothoracic Surgical Intensive Care Unite (CT SICU) and its related step-down unit. Unfortunately, everyone wanted TGC to work without looking at the reality of the protocol.

Click here for more >

 

POCT Compliance with JCAHO's National Patient Safety Goals
 Point of Care: The Journal of Near-Patient Testing & Technology: Vol 4(2) June 05, Ehrmeyer, Sharon S PhD, MT(ASCP); Darcy, Teresa P MD, MMM.

 

Today, ensuring patient safety through error prevention is a priority for healthcare organizations. In response to the Institute of Medicine report that 98,000 deaths annually in US hospitals result from preventable medical errors, the Joint Commission on Accreditation of Healthcare Organizations (JCAHO) disseminated its first national patient safety goals (NPSG).

 

On January 1, 2005, JCAHO began surveying accredited healthcare organizations for implementation of applicable 2005 goals and requirements. It is essential that point of care testing (POCT) sites in the approximately 4500 US hospitals accredited by the JCAHO understand these goals and create the necessary policies and procedures for achieving them. This report addresses the relevant NPSG identified by JCAHO for its Laboratory Program and a total quality management strategy for POCT to follow to ensure compliance with the relevant goals.

For 2005 JCAHO identified 12 NPSG for its 10 healthcare programs. These programs are ambulatory care and office-based surgery, assisted living, behavioral health care, critical access hospital, disease-specific care, home care, hospital, laboratory, long term care, and networks (integrated delivery systems, managed care and preferred provider organizations).

Click here > for the rest of this article.

 

Access does require a subscription to Point of Care: The Journal of Near-Patient Testing & Technology.

POC Connectivity Takes Hold
CAP Today, June 2005, Feature Story, by Anne Paxton

 

Point-of-care testing connectivity presents POC coordinators with a dilemma: Should they let other hospitals be the early adopters while the bugs are ironed out? Or should they rush to take advantage of the streamlined, comprehensive data capture that connectivity has to offer?

Both choices have their pluses and minuses, but point-of-care testing coordinators who have taken the leap into POC connectivity say once they got past the learning curve blues, the payoff was worth it. With the array of POC vendors and diverse analytical profiles, POC data can’t be handled by the laboratory information system or HIS without a local data-management system that connects them on a single platform.

 

Helped by the industry-wide POC connectivity standard approved in 2001, POC data-management systems are gaining a foothold in the nation’s hospitals, but obstacles remain before point-of-care results glide swiftly, seamlessly, and accurately into hospital records.

 

Connectivity solutions from Abbott POC (PrecisionWeb), Lifescan (Datalink), Medical Automation Systems (RALS), Telcor (QML) are referenced throughout this article. Click here for more >

 

Glucose Testing Variability and the Need for an Expert Oversight Committee
CAP Today, May 2005, Feature Story, Joyce G. Schwartz, MD, Samuel B. Reichberg, MD, PhD Raymond S. Gambino, MD

In 1979 a work group of the National Diabetes Data Group1 established the criteria, later endorsed by the World Health Organization Committee on Diabetes, that patients with a fasting or 2-h postprandial glucose concentration greater than 140 or 200 mg/dL, respectively, were to be considered diabetic.

 

In 1997, the Expert Committee on the Diagnosis and Classification of Diabetes Mellitus was convened to reexamine the classification and diagnostic criteria for diabetes based on the 1979 publication of the National Diabetes Data Group. As a result of its deliberations, the committee recommended several changes to the diagnostic criteria for diabetes and for lesser degrees of impaired glucose regulation.2 The use of a fasting plasma glucose, or FPG, test for the diagnosis of diabetes was recommended, and the cut point separating diabetes from nondiabetes was lowered from a FPG > 140 mg/dL to > 126 mg/dL. This change was based on data that showed an increase in prevalence and incidence of diabetic retinopathy beginning approximately at a FPG of 126 mg/dL, as well as on the desire to reduce the discrepancy that existed in the number of cases detected by the FPG cut point of > 140 mg/dL and the 2-h value in the OGTT (2-h plasma glucose) of > 200 mg/dL. Click here for more >

 

Improving Patient Care With Blood Gas Connectivity
By Michael Dalton, Advance for the Administrators of the Lab, Vol. 14 •Issue 3 • POC Connectivity Concepts

The intensive nature of a critical care environment requires physicians to respond quickly to the needs of a patient to accurately diagnose and treat him. In this diminished state of health, a patient's condition can change rapidly, so a more efficient system enables a physician to obtain arterial blood gas results rapidly. This enhanced turnaround of patient information allows the physician to assess the patient's status and implement therapeutic measures within a very short timeline.

 

One way to ensure rapid and accurate blood gas diagnostic test results is to utilize point-of-care (POC) instruments in the critical care setting linked with connectivity management solutions. There are several ways connectivity in the POC setting can bring real advantages to hospitals and laboratories and help enrich patient care in crucial areas such as system efficiency, patient security, data management and equipment and staff support. All of these workflow benefits ultimately deliver improved patient care. Click here for more

 

ICUs Tighten Belts on Blood Glucose Levels
 CAP Today, February 2005, Cover Story by William Check, PhD

 

Tight glycemic control shows growing evidence of improving morbidity and mortality

As George and Ira Gershwin famously wrote, "Love is sweeping the country!" including "All the sexes from Maine to Texas." True, "tight glycemic control in critically ill patients" doesn't have the instant emotional appeal that love evokes, but it too has been sweeping the country, becoming routine in intensive care units from Oregon to Connecticut and many places in between. And whereas love is often blamed in song with making people feel blue and brokenhearted, tight glycemic control actually makes people feel better and live longer, with some of its strongest health benefits seen in patients with cardiac conditions.

 

Most important, growing evidence indicates that tight glycemic control improves morbidity and mortality not just in diabetics, but in all critically ill patients, setting the stage for comprehensive blood glucose protocols to be adopted in ICUs. Click here for more >

 

January 1, 2005
 Bringing New POCT Equipment on Board
 Advance for the Administrators of the Lab, Vol. 14, Issue 1 POC Connectivity Concepts, by Matthew T. Patton

 

When point-of-care testing (POCT) is to be implemented on a large scale—involving multiple clinics and units or even multiple hospitals—pre-planning by multidisciplinary teams is essential. Equally important is to incorporate instrument vendor expertise into the training process. Involvement at all levels can help ensure that labs stay in regulatory compliance and remain competent users of POCT equipment.

 

Staff Involvement When dealing with quality control for employees new to the instrumentation, Lou Ann Wyer, MT(ASCP), clinical specialist, POCT/QM, Sentara Laboratory Services, Norfolk, VA, tells ADVANCE that her facility conducts precision, reportable range or calibration validation and method comparison studies during the pre-planning phase. Statistical analysis is performed on each set of data and the method's performance is approved prior to implementation. Click here for the complete article >

 

Breaking it Down POCT: The Salary Dilemma
 Advance for Medical Laboratory Professionals, Vol. 17, Issue 3, Page 14, by Kerri Penno

 

Point-of-care testing professionals often have a difficult time obtaining compensation for additional duties.The scenario is familiar across the healthcare field: lines of responsibility are blurred, expectations are high and compensation and recognition decidedly are not. Point-of-care testing (POCT) professionals are being stretched too thin and wearing too many hats. POCT coordinators (POCCs) act more like managers, and some laboratorians are in charge of more POCT work in addition to their own responsibilities without any additional compensation. This job description and salary discrepancy is generating a buzz among POCT professionals across the nation. Click here for more >

 

November 2004
More Studies Support Tight Glycemic Control in Hospitals
By Kay Downer, Clinical Laboratory News

 

For years physicians have known the importance of controlling blood glucose levels in diabetic patients, but only recently have they begun to realize its importance in treating critically ill patients—both those with and without diabetes. In the past few years, several studies have shown that a range of patient outcomes can be significantly improved by tight glycemic control, a process of maintaining blood glucose levels within a narrow target range via frequent insulin administration.

 

The rest of this article can be found in the November 2004 issue of Clinical Laboratory News.  Visit www.aacc.org/cln/default.stm for more information.

 

Push for Electronic Medical Records Gains Momentum
By Penny Allen, Clinical Laboratory News

In an executive order last April, President George W. Bush called for widespread deployment of health information technology within the next 10 years. Intended to improve health care safety, quality, efficiency, and coordination between providers in the U.S., implementing this technology is a noble but lofty goal considering that the Healthcare Information and Management Systems Society (HIMSS) reported that this year only 19% of health care provider organizations have fully operational electronic medical records (EMRs). 

 

The rest of this article can be found in the November 2004 issue of Clinical Laboratory News.  Visit www.aacc.org/cln/default.stm for more information.

 

October 2004
 Making the Connection
 By Todd Smith, Advance for Administrators of the Lab

 

Amid the information age where technologies are exploding and prices are shrinking, there is little excuse for point-of-care testing that is not interfaced.

Connectivity is an important and complicated issue in point-of-care testing (POCT). The basic idea is to replace all manual data entry, but there still is a lot of manual testing. With non-connected testing, the operator must manually enter the result and other pertinent data to get it into the information system.

 

The aim of connectivity is to provide all this in an electronic, instantaneous fashion. But one of the most significant issues surrounding connectivity is the question of compatibility.The benefits of interfacing POCT are obvious. All lab testing—whether it is point of care, central lab, satellite lab, etc.—must be made part of the medical record. Nearly 40 percent of testing is performed at the patient's bedside, say experts. With technology becoming more affordable, more devices bearing wireless capability and all the networks present in the hospitals, there are numerous options for connecting devices.

"To do point of care without interfacing makes no sense at all," says Kenneth E. Blick, PhD, professor, department of Pathology, University of Oklahoma Health Sciences Center and Medical Center, Oklahoma City. "There are no excuses for letting devices proliferate throughout the hospital and having non-lab people select the devices and use them in a way that is not very businesslike."

 

This is only a small part of this article.  The complete story can be found in the October 2004 issue of Advance for the Administrators of the Lab, Vol. 13 • Issue 10 • Page 63.  Click here for more >>

 

September 2004
POCT and the New CMS Guidelines
By Sue Auxter-Parham, Clinical Laboratory News

Late last year, the Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services (CMS) released “Appendix C, Survey Procedures and Interpretive Guidelines for Laboratories and Laboratory Services”. 

This 300-plus-page resource not only provides a general guide for implementing CLIA ’88, but also gives clinical labs a new way to approach quality control (QC). Check out the September 2004 issue of Clinical Laboratory News for more on this story >>

 

August 2004
Applying Evidence-Based Medicine to Point-of-Care Testing to Improve Medical Care
By Renee DiIulio, CLP, August 2004

 

Point-of-care testing (POCT) has been embraced by a medical community that equates new technology with better patient care. Providers of medical care are under pressure to provide care more quickly than in the past, and many see POCT as a solution to remove patient bottlenecks. 

However, James H. Nichols, PhD, DABCC, FACB, said there is a proliferation of misinformation about POCT. Nichols, associate professor of pathology at Tufts University School of Medicine in Boston and director of clinical chemistry at Baystate Health System in Springfield, Mass, gave the keynote address, “Finding Value at the Bedside: Evidence-Based Practice for POCT,” at the 20th International Symposium on Critical Care and Point-of-Care Testing in Wurzburg, Germany. “Faster is often understood to mean better outcomes without the research to back this conclusion,” he said.

 

Evidence-Based Medicine (EBM) represents a new age in health care. Nichols traced medicine’s development through the ages, from its dawn with humors, astrology, and bloodletting, through its dark period characterized by belief-based treatments, into an enlightenment with the discovery of the pathologic basis of disease, and followed by subsequent growth with advances in prevention, diagnosis, and treatment. Click here for more >>

 

August 2004
 Optimizing Point-of-Care Testing
 By Barbara M. Goldsmith, PhD, FACB

 

POCT Applications as a Useful Tool for Rapid Laboratory Results

Point-of-care testing is growing rapidly at an estimated rate of 12 percent to 16 percent per year and is predicted to double by 2005, becoming a $950 million market. In 1997, the Food and Drug Administration convened an expert panel to describe future trends in medical device technology over the next 10 years. The panel identified six major trend categories. Home and self-care and minimally invasive procedures were among the six categories, each having applications in POCT.

 

POCT is referred to as laboratory testing performed outside of the clinical laboratory. It can be performed at the patient's bedside or in a centralized area within a unit, such as an intensive care unit. POCT applications include:

  • Testing for emergency diagnosis (e.g. acute cardiac syndromes)

  • Treatment and monitoring of existing disease (e.g. diabetes)

  • Testing in the physician's office

  • Self-testing

The diversity of testing locations also is broad, including: acute care settings

  • Ambulances

  • Clinics

  • Schools

  • Drug treatment centers

  • Patients' homes

Click here for more >>
Last updated: 01/08/2015 Questions or corrections: My Point of Care.net.© 2008 Medical Automation Systems, Inc. Legal Notice.
This web site is made possible in total by the support of Medical Automation Systems.

Back to top