Never Give In—Fighting for POC
Patient Safety
Cap Today,
By Anne Ford
In
grammar school, the “three Rs” still hold sway (or
so we all hope). But in point-of-care testing,
there’s just one R that matters: Relentless. It’s a
word that comes up over and over again in
conversation with hospital POC testing
coordinators—yes, even more often than “specimen” or
“CLIA.”
“People pretty much
know I’m relentless about certain things,” says Tim
Deen, MLT(ASCP), MT (HEW), POC testing manager at
Medical City Hospital, Dallas. “My chief nursing
officer has kindly referred to me as a ‘tough-love’
type of person.” In that regard he has a lot in
common with Deb Phaup, BS (MT), MT(ASCP), CLS (NCA),
POC coordinator at Mount Auburn Hospital, Cambridge,
Mass. “I’m relentless,” she admits, laughing.
Personable as Deen
and Phaup are, they know that POC testing safety is
nothing to joke about. With thousands of POC tests
performed in their hospitals each month, theirs is
not exactly a sit-back-and-relax situation. With
their colleague Joann Bauwens, BS(MT), MT(ASCP),
MA(HSM), interim director of laboratory services and
POC testing coordinator at SSM St. Mary’s Health
Center, St. Louis, Mo., they provide insight into
what keeps POC testing on the safe side.
Both Deen and Phaup
assumed their POC responsibilities just over a
decade ago, when bedside testing wasn’t as
frequently conducted or as closely regulated as it
is now. When Deen began, he says, Medical City
Hospital’s point-of-care program was “a lax system,
where the lab was not involved.” And at Mount Auburn
Hospital, where the POC coordinator position was
created for Phaup, “nobody even knew what POC
testing was,” she says. “The first week I started
the job, I came into work and the then-manager
didn’t even know where to put me. I was just
standing in the hall without a clue.”
Click here for more>
Stuck in the Middleware
Labs Look for Answers as New
Consortium Aims to Untangle the Mess
By Deborah Levenson, May 2008,
Clinical Laoratory News
Mention
“middleware” in a room full of lab directors, and
you are likely to hear varied definitions of what it
is and a wide array of uses for it. But generally
speaking, the term has come to describe any hardware
and software that acts as an intermediary between
instruments and lab information systems (LIS) and
allows them to exchange data or perform data
management tasks the LIS can’t.
Middleware’s
popularity took off in the early 1990s when personal
computers that generated reports and buffered
results became more common. Since then, middleware
has become mainstream in POCT and a common,
relatively inexpensive solution for core labs
grappling with a wide range of problems including
shortages of med techs, increases in test volume,
more complex devices and lab operations, a federal
push for electronic health records, and an overall
trend toward ensuring quality of care.
Click here for more >
Connectivity: Success in POCT
Two major data
management systems for POCT now comply with the
CLSI’s connectivity standard, easing the transfer of
data in institutions with labs that use these
systems from Telcor (Lincoln, Neb.) and Medical
Automation Systems (Charlottesville, Va.).
Connectivity enabled by the standard and compliant
systems not only improves patient care, but also
eases billing and compliance documentation.
With the
forthcoming IICC standard, core labs may one day
enjoy the sort of connectivity POC users and lab
staff at Carolinas Medical Center-NorthEast in
Concord, N.C. now have. With the aid of her RALS+
system from Medical Automation Systems and its
ability to connect to Roche Accuchek Inform glucose
meters, Laboratory Education and POC Coordinator Deb
Norkett, MT, ASCP has seen marked improvements in
compliance and billing. She interfaces all manual
tests through the Accucheck, which also allows her
to enter pregnancy test results. After taking
advantage of that function, she now achieves a 100%
billing rate, while in the past she grappled with a
15% deficit in billing because of lack of
documentation in the emergency room. “Before using
RALS, we couldn’t capture figures on the volume of
certain manual tests, so they were built into the
room charge,” she recalled.
Click here for more >