POC Groups  POC Meeting Calendar UPDATED!

AACC/CPOCT POCC of the...

Search this site:

News

New Designs of POCT: Drivers of Change -

6th Annual Point-of-Care Coordinators Forum

Click here for more information and to register

Dawning Technologies and MAS to develop a business partnership
Click here

POCT Coordinators Best Practices: Mastering Staffing and Compliance Challenges
Wednesday, July 9, 2008 2:00 - 3:30 PM
Click here

Peggy Mann Named 2008 POCT Coordinator

of the Year


Do you know what the National Mean Blood Glucose for POCT was in 2007?

Click here for the answer


Change to Unannounced CAP Inspections
click here

FAQs
CAP POCT Checklist
Click here
Joint Commission Stds
Click here

POC Vendor Info
RESPONSE BIOMEDICAL UPDATED!
Getting listed
Complete vendor listing

Quick Links
AACC CPOCT Division
Critical Points Newsletter
Bloodgas.org
CLMA
FDA News
GlycemicControl.net
Lab Tests Online

Have something you want to publish on POC.net? Click here

Contact Us
Home
Never Give In—Fighting for POC Patient Safety
Cap Today, June 2008, Feature Story  By Anne Ford

In grammar school, the “three Rs” still hold sway (or so we all hope). But in point-of-care testing, there’s just one R that matters: Relentless. It’s a word that comes up over and over again in conversation with hospital POC testing coordinators—yes, even more often than “specimen” or “CLIA.”

“People pretty much know I’m relentless about certain things,” says Tim Deen, MLT(ASCP), MT (HEW), POC testing manager at Medical City Hospital, Dallas. “My chief nursing officer has kindly referred to me as a ‘tough-love’ type of person.” In that regard he has a lot in common with Deb Phaup, BS (MT), MT(ASCP), CLS (NCA), POC coordinator at Mount Auburn Hospital, Cambridge, Mass. “I’m relentless,” she admits, laughing.

Personable as Deen and Phaup are, they know that POC testing safety is nothing to joke about. With thousands of POC tests performed in their hospitals each month, theirs is not exactly a sit-back-and-relax situation. With their colleague Joann Bauwens, BS(MT), MT(ASCP), MA(HSM), interim director of laboratory services and POC testing coordinator at SSM St. Mary’s Health Center, St. Louis, Mo., they provide insight into what keeps POC testing on the safe side.

Both Deen and Phaup assumed their POC responsibilities just over a decade ago, when bedside testing wasn’t as frequently conducted or as closely regulated as it is now. When Deen began, he says, Medical City Hospital’s point-of-care program was “a lax system, where the lab was not involved.” And at Mount Auburn Hospital, where the POC coordinator position was created for Phaup, “nobody even knew what POC testing was,” she says. “The first week I started the job, I came into work and the then-manager ­didn’t even know where to put me. I was just standing in the hall without a clue.”  Click here for more>


Stuck in the Middleware
Labs Look for Answers as New Consortium Aims to Untangle the Mess
By Deborah Levenson, May 2008, Clinical Laoratory News

 

Mention “middleware” in a room full of lab directors, and you are likely to hear varied definitions of what it is and a wide array of uses for it. But generally speaking, the term has come to describe any hardware and software that acts as an intermediary between instruments and lab information systems (LIS) and allows them to exchange data or perform data management tasks the LIS can’t.

 

Middleware’s popularity took off in the early 1990s when personal computers that generated reports and buffered results became more common. Since then, middleware has become mainstream in POCT and a common, relatively inexpensive solution for core labs grappling with a wide range of problems including shortages of med techs, increases in test volume, more complex devices and lab operations, a federal push for electronic health records, and an overall trend toward ensuring quality of care.

Click here for more >

 

Connectivity: Success in POCT

Two major data management systems for POCT now comply with the CLSI’s connectivity standard, easing the transfer of data in institutions with labs that use these systems from Telcor (Lincoln, Neb.) and Medical Automation Systems (Charlottesville, Va.). Connectivity enabled by the standard and compliant systems not only improves patient care, but also eases billing and compliance documentation.

 

With the forthcoming IICC standard, core labs may one day enjoy the sort of connectivity POC users and lab staff at Carolinas Medical Center-NorthEast in Concord, N.C. now have. With the aid of her RALS+ system from Medical Automation Systems and its ability to connect to Roche Accuchek Inform glucose meters, Laboratory Education and POC Coordinator Deb Norkett, MT, ASCP has seen marked improvements in compliance and billing. She interfaces all manual tests through the Accucheck, which also allows her to enter pregnancy test results. After taking advantage of that function, she now achieves a 100% billing rate, while in the past she grappled with a 15% deficit in billing because of lack of documentation in the emergency room. “Before using RALS, we couldn’t capture figures on the volume of certain manual tests, so they were built into the room charge,” she recalled. Click here for more >

Click here for more stories in our Article Archives...

Last updated: 07/02/2008  • Questions or corrections: Webmaster.
© 2008 Medical Automation Systems, Inc. Legal Notice.
This web site is made possible in total by the support of Medical Automation Systems.