Contact UsHome

Starting a POC Group >

POCC of the Year >

POC Vendors >

Publications >

POC Procedures >

POC Demographics


Ever wonder what devices, connectivity system, or LIS that POCCs in your region, local POC group, or through the country use in their program? Click here

2012 POC Calendar


Jan

Feb

Mar

Apr

May

June

July

Aug

Sept

Oct

Nov

Dec

 

2011 POC Calendar


Jan

Feb

Mar

Apr

May

June

July

Aug

Sept

Oct

Nov

Dec


POC Groups

Alabama

Arizona

Baltimore/Chesapeake Bay

Bay Area (CA) 

Bay State (MA) 

Capitol (DC)

Central Florida 

Connecticut 

Delmarva 

First Coast Florida 

Georgia 

Heart of America 

KEYPOCC

Louisiana 

Midwest 

New Jersey 

New York City 

North Carolina

North Country (MN) 

North Texas 

Northwest (OR) 

Ohio 

Ontario (CN) 

Puget Sound (WA) 

Rocky Mountain 

San Diego 

South Carolina 

Southern California 

Southwest Florida 

Southwest 

Tennessee 

Texas Gulf Coast

Tri-State (IL) 

Upstate NY 

Virginia


WEB LINKS


GlycemicControl.net


LabTestsOnline.org


NACB Guidelines


Journal of Point of Care Testing

Nominations for the 2012
POCC of the Year Award due March 15!

This award recognizes outstanding achievements in the POCT field by a person primarily responsible for an institution’s POCT program and consists of a glass trophy, $500 cash and funding of up to $1,350 for travel and attendance expenses at the AACC annual meeting.

The 2012 honoree will be recognized during the AACC CPOCT Division meeting, July 24, 2012 during the AACC Annual Meeting and Clinical Lab Expo.

POCT NEWS


 2012 POCT Conferences:

 May 12 - San Diego, CA

 May 18 - Los Angeles, CA

 June 4 - Boston, MA

 Sept 24 - Teaneck, NJ








A Look at Emerging

Cardiac Biomarkers
What Type of Analyte will be the Most Informative?

By Genna Rollins, January 2012 Clinical Laboratory News

Serum-based biomarkers have been integral to the advancement of the field of cardiology during the past half-century, and with better knowledge about their role in the pathophysiology of cardiovascular disease (CVD), their utility has expanded from merely aiding in the diagnosis of disease to being important in predicting risk and prognosis. Some, such as the natriuretic peptides, B-type natriuretic peptide (BNP) and its amino-terminal pro peptide equivalent, N-terminal-proBNP (NT-proBNP), also are being actively explored as a means of guiding therapy. Novel biomarkers continue to be evaluated, along with new lines of investigation, including genomics and metabolomics, which hold the potential for even greater insights into CVD and its treatments. More >

Advanced Applications

of Cardiac Biomarkers
A review of scientific studies explores the value of biomarkers in assessing risk and prognosis.

Online Extra by David Plaut and Audrey Quinlivan, Advance for Administrators of the Laboratory, Jan 2012

Coronary disease is the most prevalent lethal hazard of hypertension, dyslipidemia, glucose intolerance and cigarette smoking. A number of biomarkers will detect cardiac damage, which makes them useful not only for the diagnosis of acute myocardial infarction (AMI), but also to detect persons at risk of an AMI as well as for prognostic information following an MI or invasive procedures. The value of serum biomarkers in assessing risk and prognosis is discussed in this review.

Studies by Daniels et al. Some 957 older adults, 39 of whom had detectable troponin (Tn), were studied by Daniels et al.1 for seven years.

 

The risk ratio was determined at the end of the study period: Apparently healthy adults with detectable Tn or elevated N-terminal pro-B-type natriuretic peptide (NT-proBNP) levels are at increased risk of death (risk = 2.0 and 1.8 respectively). Those with both Tn and NT-proBNP elevations are at even higher risk (3.0);1 this increased risk persists for years.  More >

Alere Completes Acquisitions of MAS/RALS and LDS/AegisPOC
Acquisitions Compliment Alere's Vision of Single Platform Connectivity for POCT

Alere Inc. announces that it has completed the acquisition of Medical Automation Systems, Inc. (MAS) and Laboratory Data Systems, Inc. (LDS). These acquisitions strengthen Alere’s vision for open connectivity architecture at the point-of-care (POC) and in the critical care setting. Currently, MAS’s RALS® and LDS’s AegisPOC™ data management systems are installed in nearly 2,000 hospitals throughout the US and are interfaced to more than 100 POC devices.
For more information or if you have any specific questions, click here.

Connectivity Aids Compliance
More Tests Means More Requirements
Advance for Administrators of the Laboratory, At the Bedside, By Alice Travanty, BS, MT(ASCP)

As the number of point-of-care tests (POCTs) expands rapidly, the need to meet more regulatory requirements also increases. Agencies such as the Joint Commission, the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services, COLA and the College of American Pathologists have set standards for POCT, including waived and non-waived testing, to ensure quality results.

Because POCT is often performed by non-laboratory personnel in all areas of the hospital, documentation of compliance can be difficult to achieve. Connectivity-the electronic transmission of data from POC analyzers to laboratory and hospital information systems-aids compliance with regulatory standards.

With a bidirectional interface, information is sent to meters so only certified operators can perform testing. The system tracks the dates of the operator's original certification and expiration, last good QC and last patient test. Some analyzers allow messages to be sent to operators to warn them when they are getting close to expiration and remind them to perform QC. More >

A New Approach to QC

How Can Risk Management Help Labs?
Clinical Laboratory News, November 2011: Volume 37, Number 11, By Bill Malone

When the Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services (CMS) finalized the Clinical Laboratory Improvement Amendments regulations in 2003, many in the lab community expressed dissatisfaction with what was perceived as ambiguous and unscientific guidance on how to conduct quality control (QC). While the regulations set basic requirements for testing external QC materials, most laboratories found they needed to go above and beyond these standards to avoid quality problems.

Now the Clinical and Laboratory Standards Institute (CLSI) has published a long-awaited guideline that aims to fill this gap, enabling labs to customize QC to match both changing technology and the uniqueness of each lab. However, in what form CMS and other accrediting organizations will adopt or endorse it remains to be seen.

Published in October, the new guideline, EP-23, Laboratory Quality Control Based on Risk Management, translates the time-honored concept of risk management used in manufacturing, defense, aerospace, and other industries into the language of the clinical lab.  More

Click here for more stories in our Article Archives...

Last updated: 01/25/2012 Questions or corrections: editor@pointofcare.net.© 2011 Medical Automation Systems, Inc.

Legal Notice. This web site is made possible in total by the support of Medical Automation Systems.    BACK TO TOP